Management of Anaphylactic Shock

Management of Anaphylactic Shock

Authors

  • Aisyah Faculty of Medicine, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia
  • Susilo Faculty of Medicine, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia

Keywords:

Management, Anaphylactic Shock

Abstract

Background: The literature on the management of anaphylactic shock highlights a critical need for immediate and effective interventions to mitigate the potentially fatal consequences of this medical emergency. Literature Review: The literature underscores the necessity of comprehensive patient education and the development of written emergency treatment plans, particularly for individuals at risk of severe allergic reactions. This proactive approach is vital for effective anaphylaxis management, as it empowers patients and caregivers to recognize symptoms and respond appropriately. The emphasis on having multiple epinephrine auto-injectors available is also crucial, given that some patients may require repeated doses during an anaphylactic episode. Conclusion: The significance of accurate diagnosis and triage grading in emergency treatment is also emphasized, as misdiagnosis can lead to inadequate treatment and potentially fatal outcomes (Dondi et al., 2022) . Collectively, these articles illustrate that while progress has been made in understanding and managing anaphylaxis, ongoing challenges persist that require a concerted effort from healthcare professionals, patients, and the broader community to enhance educational initiatives and improve emergency response capabilities.

References

Estelle R. Simons, F., R. F. Ardusso, L., Beatrice Bilò, M., M. El-Gamal, Y., K. Ledford, D., Ring, J., Sanchez-Borges, M., Enrico Senna, G., Sheikh, A., & Y. Thong, B., 2011. World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Anaphylaxis. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Estelle R Simons, F., RF Ardusso, L., Beatrice Bilò, M., Cardona, V., Ebisawa, M., M El-Gamal, Y., Lieberman, P., F Lockey, R., Muraro, A., Roberts, G., Sanchez-Borges, M., Sheikh, A., P Shek, L., V Wallace, D., & Worm, M., 2014. International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis. [PDF]

M Risenga, S., Kriel, M., Karabus, S., I Manjra, A., L Gray, C., Goddard, E., C Lang, A., J Terblanche, A., A van der Spuy, D., & E Levin, M., 2014. Severe food allergy and anaphylaxis: Treatment, risk assessment and risk reduction. [PDF]

I. Nwaru, B., Dhami, S., & Sheikh, A., 2017. Idiopathic Anaphylaxis. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Czyż, R., Leśkiewicz, M., & Czyż, I., 2018. Anaphylaxis: the current state of knowledge. [PDF]

T Prince, B., Mikhail, I., & R Stukus, D., 2018. Underuse of epinephrine for the treatment of anaphylaxis: missed opportunities. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

K. Brar, K., Harizaj, A., & Nowak-Wegrzyn, A., 2021. Management of Anaphylaxis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Sipahi Cimen, S. & Baykara Sayili, S., 2022. Level of knowledge among healthcare professionals regarding anaphylaxis. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Dondi, A., Calamelli, E., Scarpini, S., Candela, E., Battista Biserni, G., Ghizzi, C., Lombardi, F., Salvago, P., Serra, L., Corsini, I., & Lanari, M., 2022. Triage Grading and Correct Diagnosis Are Critical for the Emergency Treatment of Anaphylaxis. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Downloads

Published

2024-10-27

How to Cite

Aisyah, Aisyah, and Susilo Susilo. 2024. “Management of Anaphylactic Shock”. The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research 5 (8): 28-43. https://doi.org/10.70070/f6scne47.