Comparison of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy With Traditional Excisional Surgery For Hemorrhoidal Disease: An Updated Systematic Review

Comparison of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy With Traditional Excisional Surgery For Hemorrhoidal Disease: An Updated Systematic Review

Authors

  • Atep Lutpia Pahlepi General Practitioner, Gunung Jati Regional General Hospital, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia
  • Ibrahim Risyad Pradana Obstetric and Gynaecology Consultant, Gunung Jati Regional General Hospital, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia
  • Rostikawaty Azizah Faculty of Medicine, General Soedirman University, Indonesia

Keywords:

Hemorrhoids, stapled hemorrhoidopexy, conventional hemorrhoidectomy

Abstract

Background: Hemorrhoid patients encounter prolonged postoperative discomfort following conventional hemorrhoid surgery, resulting in delays in resuming work and daily routines. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy emerges as a novel approach, potentially enhancing pain management and recovery. This study aims to systematically review the comparison of stapled hemorrhoidopexy and conventional open hemorrhoidectomy in literatures of the last 5 years. Methods: The systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 standards and examined full-text English literature published between 2019 and 2024. This review excluded editorials, review papers from the same journal, and submissions without a DOI. Literature was sourced from online platforms such as PubMed, SagePub, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Result: A total of  1,099   articles were retrieved from online databases (PubMed, SagePub, SpringerLink and Google Scholar). After three rounds of screening, four articles directly relevant to the systematic review were selected for full-text reading and analysis. Conclusion: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy exhibited superior short-term outcomes compared to traditional hemorrhoidectomy. However, the traditional method had a lower recurrence rate compared to stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

References

Aibuedefe B, Kling SM, Philp MM, Ross HM, Poggio JL. An update on surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis [Internet]. 2021 Sep 1 ;36(9):2041–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03953-3

Aziz Ali MMA, Nada MA, El-Wahab EHA, Abbas AA. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan–Morgan technique (open hemorrhoidectomy) in surgical treatment of third-degree and fourth-degree circumferential piles. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery [Internet]. 2022 Sep ;41(3):1240. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ejos/fulltext/2022/07000/Stapled_hemorrhoidopexy_versus_Milligan_Morgan.48.aspx?context=LatestArticles

Mir Mohammad Sadeghi P, Rabiee M, Ghasemi Darestani N, Alesaheb F, Zeinalkhani F. Short term results of stapled versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy within 1 year follow-up. Int J Burns Trauma [Internet]. 2021 Feb 15 ;11(1):69–74. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012873/

Khan Z, Razzaq S, Zareen N, Hussain A, Kashif M, Khan JI. Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: Compare the Outcomes of both Techniques in Patients With Grade III and IV Hemorrhoids. 2020;

Khan AA, Mahar T, Adnan MK, Surahio AR, Manan A, Ahmad I. Postoperative recovery; Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy versus Conventional haemorrhoidectomy. The Professional Medical Journal [Internet]. 2020 Jan 10 ;27(01):166–71. Available from: https://theprofesional.com/index.php/tpmj/article/view/4098

Rahman DrA, Hasan DrM, Uddin DrA, Roy DrPK. Comparative Study of Outcome of Surgical Treatment of Haemorrhoid between Open Haemorrhoidectomy and Stapled Haemorhoidopexy. East African Scholars J Med Sci [Internet]. 2023 Feb 5 ;6(02):34–9. Available from: https://www.easpublisher.com/media/features_articles/EASMS_62_34-39.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-01-04

How to Cite

Atep Lutpia Pahlepi, Ibrahim Risyad Pradana, and Rostikawaty Azizah. 2025. “Comparison of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy With Traditional Excisional Surgery For Hemorrhoidal Disease: An Updated Systematic Review”. The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research 8 (1): 39-53. https://doi.org/10.70070/y1ypg854.