Use of Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Primary Studies
Keywords:
Tenecteplase, Acute ischemic stroke, Thrombolysis, Alteplase, Modified Rankin Scale, Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, Endovascular thrombectomy, tPA, ReperfusionAbstract
Background: Tenecteplase (TNK), a bioengineered variant of alteplase with superior fibrin specificity, prolonged plasma half-life, and single-bolus administration, has emerged as a promising alternative thrombolytic agent in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The growing body of randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence necessitates a comprehensive synthesis to guide clinical implementation.
Objectives: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase compared with alteplase or standard medical care in adult patients with AIS across multiple clinical scenarios, doses, and time windows, drawing upon all available high-quality RCT evidence.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. RCTs and primary studies comparing tenecteplase with alteplase or standard medical care in AIS were eligible. Two independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2) tool. Primary outcomes included excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–1 at 90 days), functional independence (mRS 0–2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality.
Results: Seventeen primary studies enrolling over 11,800 patients met inclusion criteria. Tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg was non-inferior or superior to alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) for excellent functional outcome at 90 days across multiple large-scale RCTs (AcT, TRACE-2, ORIGINAL, ATTEST-2, TASTE). Updated meta-analysis confirmed TNK superiority for mRS 0–1 at 3 months (RR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.10). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates were comparable (RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.83–1.53). Intravenous TNK prior to endovascular thrombectomy (BRIDGE-TNK) achieved significantly higher functional independence (52.9% vs. 44.1%; RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.01–1.43). Extended-window TNK (TRACE-III, TIMELESS) demonstrated benefit in selected patients. The 0.4 mg/kg dose was associated with increased hemorrhagic risk.
Conclusion: Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg is non-inferior—and in several outcomes superior—to alteplase for AIS thrombolysis within 4.5 hours, with comparable safety. Single-bolus administration confers operational advantages. Tenecteplase should be considered the preferred thrombolytic agent in current AIS management, particularly in settings with endovascular capability.
References
Parsons M, Spratt N, Bivard A, et al. A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(12):1099-1107. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1109842. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/5d9b2cd2f685599aaf69f96defb7e36c/
Huang X, Cheripelli BK, Lloyd SM, et al. Alteplase versus tenecteplase for thrombolysis after ischaemic stroke (ATTEST): a phase 2, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(4):368-376. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00017-6. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/3ad391c5714d5025ae209acb96b5e9bb/
Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J. 2021;6(1):I-LXII. doi:10.1177/2396987321989865. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/5721969f3cf9541d90d664496a522b57/
Wang Y, Li S, Zhao X, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischaemic cerebrovascular events (TRACE-2): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10377):645-654. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02600-9. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/37dc1fa425575703bb583ec5e7252817/
Meng X, Shi J, Li Z, et al. Tenecteplase vs Alteplase for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ORIGINAL Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024;331(9):764-773. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.0517. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/d002e51db35b53379f61ae3dada15b80/
Menon BK, Buck BH, Singh N, et al. Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in Canada (AcT): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, registry-linked, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;400(10347):161-169. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01054-6. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/6bf32ef07f485d0cb269f922f32db16d/
Palaiodimou L, Katsanos AH, Schellinger PD, et al. Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours. Neurology. 2024;102(4):e209185. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000209185. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/fe02f5515d04545c83a544110ffa6918/
Muir KW, Ford G, Bhatt DL, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute stroke within 4·5 h of onset (ATTEST-2): a randomised, parallel group, open-label trial. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23(1):33-42. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00360-2. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/26687201b52c583195661ef63a4b0847/
Qiu Z, Zhang X, Huang J, et al. Intravenous Tenecteplase before Thrombectomy in Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2025. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2405990. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/0d0c3182183c5904ac6f4049f2b8ed04/
Xiong Y, Wu M, Liu W, et al. Tenecteplase for Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours without Thrombectomy. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(3):203-212. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2403735. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/1b24ec9da167529897262368b3c55c75/
Kvistad CE, Novotny V, Logallo N, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for the management of acute ischaemic stroke in Norway (NOR-TEST 2, part A): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(6):511-519. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00124-7. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/3fea6a6c8a565fecb047a7c5d24ffec4/
Ma Y, Reeves MJ, Churilov L, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies. J Neurol. 2024;271(5):2472-2485. doi:10.1007/s00415-024-12202-8. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/d90a5b774d4c5585a98e55fd719306a3/
Rehman AU, Rehman AU, Mohsin et al. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (S45.002). Neurology. 2023;100(17 Suppl). Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/636da89d9f4d528097d19d68b29691f8/
Zhang X, Zhong J, Wang Y, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aging (Albany NY). 2023;15(9):3627-3641. doi:10.18632/aging.204676. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/4dfb000b2c9857aaa15fb6aefb6fa265/
Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Churilov L, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase before thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(17):1573-1582. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1716405. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/551cf840f40a5dd3a5aea790d5bbeb08/
Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Churilov L, et al. Effect of Intravenous Tenecteplase Dose on Cerebral Reperfusion Before Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: The EXTEND-IA TNK Part 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1257-1265. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.1511. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/667b5d6683ec51c686dd0f36df032210/
Huang J, Wang Z, Dou Z, et al. Bridging thrombolysis versus direct thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: a network meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00415-025-12987-5. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/e40818621f4b5490a24fbab5d078398c/
Huang X, Cheripelli BK, Lloyd SM, et al. International Journal of Stroke. 2016;11(9):1007-1016. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/07af1abc11b35b518255705ff024aab5/
Albers GW, Henninger N, Liebeskind DS, et al. Tenecteplase for Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours with Perfusion-Imaging Selection. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(8):701-711. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2310421. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/1b0692dca55f54988d455a9f390a4027/
Bala F, Kaskar O, Jayaraman MV, et al. Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the AcT Randomized Trial. J Stroke. 2024;26(1):134-144. doi:10.5853/jos.2023.02712. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/64648ccc2eae5177a056861db6a87bde/
Kong Z, Qiu Z, et al. BRIDGE-TNK Subgroup Analysis: TNK plus endovascular thrombectomy for AIS with tandem lesions. Eur Stroke J. 2026. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/72f4e7a5bfd75857b02a45522d5185ab/
Wang Z, Li Y, Mou Z, et al. Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Stroke. 2025;56(3):652-661. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048891. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/85e3e89dbcc65866ae4b9b2b1706f3db/
Huang J, Xu J, Chen Y, et al. Intra-Arterial Tenecteplase Following Endovascular Reperfusion for Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke: The POST-TNK Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.0143. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/d4b7171f0a2b5974aefd5b4706f02585/
Miao Z, Cai X, Deng L, et al. Intra-arterial Tenecteplase for Acute Stroke After Successful Endovascular Therapy: The ANGEL-TNK Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025;333(7):569-579. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.27462. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/552fc06400be5d2e9c8b44b868061ebd/
Menezes S, et al. Abstract 4368490: Intra-Arterial Tenecteplase as an Adjunct to Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circulation. 2025;152(Suppl). Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/30eec3b408075c71913d19e3e407af3a/
Singh N, Menon BK, Buck BH, et al. Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis From the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2023;54(6):1500-1508. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041795. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/1b0ea0239325558598601adfd3427826/
Mitchell PJ, Yan B, Churilov L, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard bridging thrombolytic with endovascular thrombectomy within 4·5 h of stroke onset: an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;400(10363):1697-1706. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01571-9. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/a2496c8359c35e1f9554f82294b3796b/
Logallo N, Novotny V, Assmus J, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(10):781-788. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/64eebfff207d59ac9dcf842650fb9632/
Singh N, Barber P, Pridmore M, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke with Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2). Int J Stroke. 2024;19(3):353-360. doi:10.1177/17474930241229430. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/0c76a02bbc1d5d889577cf1e2b1c5549/
Parsons MW, Churilov L, Konstantinos L, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for thrombolysis in patients selected by use of perfusion imaging within 4·5 h of onset of ischaemic stroke (TASTE): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23(3):263-273. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00003-1. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/035f0161bb765cb099ceb3c67474bd9a/
Burgos AM, Saver JL. Evidence that tenecteplase is noninferior to alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials. Stroke. 2019;50(8):2156-2162. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025080. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/e43122b2aeb35bf58348e18a9c27a27a/
Wu N, Feng S, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase compared to alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2024;271(4):1927-1940. doi:10.1007/s00415-024-12183-8. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/2c338e4758d45e00a52ca24037ed44ac/
Huang X, MacIsaac R, Thompson JL, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase in stroke thrombolysis: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(5):534-543. doi:10.1177/1747493016641112. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/07af1abc11b35b518255705ff024aab5/
Marinheiro G, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke beyond 4.5-hour window: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke. 2026;57(Suppl). Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/5dc7b20ed623514c905f38f6624ec417/
Mesa Martínez R, Tejada García J, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase in EVT-enriched stroke care: Real-world evidence from over 210,000 patients. Eur Stroke J. 2026. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/cee7d5ee9b6f575f8a4c4696b1ed207a/
Qiu Z, Yang B, Sang H, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase before endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: The Multicenter, Randomized, BRIDGE-TNK Trial Protocol. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(3):e031897. doi:10.1161/JAHA.123.031897. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/c8f40707950953bfb7d698a6a6bf5efc/
Bivard A, Parsons MW, Churilov L, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for stroke thrombolysis evaluation (TASTE): A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled phase III non-inferiority trial protocol. Int J Stroke. 2023;18(6):749-755. doi:10.1177/17474930231160162. Available at: https://consensus.app/papers/details/67892cdc2c655a72aab98981b674081f/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bayu Aji Perdana, Mega Siti Fasicha (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing here keep copyright but grant the journal first publication rights, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License. They can distribute their work non-exclusively elsewhere with an acknowledgment of its first publication in this journal. Posting the work online before and during submission for earlier and greater citation is encouraged, reflecting Open Access benefits.
