Relationship Between Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume on CT Scan and Glasgow Coma Scale Score: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Primary Studies

Relationship Between Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume on CT Scan and Glasgow Coma Scale Score: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Primary Studies

Authors

  • Novita Lusiana Hidayah General Hospital, Purwokerto Regency, Central Java, Indonesia

Keywords:

Intracerebral hemorrhage, hematoma volume, Glasgow Coma Scale, CT scan, ABC/2 method, ICH score, neurological outcome, prognosis, systematic review, cerebral hemorrhage

Abstract

Introduction

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) constitutes approximately 10–15% of all strokes globally and remains one of the most devastating forms of acute cerebrovascular disease, with 30-day mortality rates exceeding 40%. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and hematoma volume measured via non-contrast CT scan are two of the most widely studied clinical and radiological parameters in the acute prognostication of ICH. Despite robust individual evidence, comprehensive systematic synthesis examining the direct quantitative relationship between ICH volume on CT and GCS score is lacking. This systematic review aims to consolidate existing evidence on this critical association to inform clinical decision-making, risk stratification, and therapeutic planning.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted from inception through June 2025, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies were included if they reported quantitative data on both ICH volume (measured by CT-based ABC/2 or planimetric method) and GCS score in adult patients with spontaneous supratentorial or infratentorial ICH.

Results

A total of 18 eligible studies comprising 8,247 patients were included. ICH volume was consistently and inversely correlated with GCS score across all included studies (r = -0.58 to -0.82; all p < 0.001). Patients with GCS 3–8 (severe depression) demonstrated hematoma volumes significantly greater than those with GCS 9–12 (moderate) or GCS 13–15 (mild-to-normal): mean difference of 28.4 mL (95% CI: 22.1–34.7 mL; p < 0.001). An ICH volume threshold of ≥30 mL independently predicted GCS ≤ 8 (OR 4.21; 95% CI 3.15–5.63; p < 0.001). Intraventricular hemorrhage extension, deep ICH location, and hematoma expansion further amplified the GCS-volume relationship. The ICH Score (which integrates both GCS and volume) demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.86–0.91) compared to either parameter alone.

Discussion

The strong inverse relationship between ICH volume and GCS score reflects the direct effect of hematoma mass on intracranial pressure and cortical/subcortical functional depression. Location-specific volume thresholds modulate this relationship: deep-seated hemorrhages (thalamic, basal ganglia) produce greater neurological depression at smaller volumes compared to lobar hemorrhages. Serial neurological assessment using GCS at 6 hours post-admission adds incremental prognostic value beyond baseline imaging. Clinicians must avoid prognostic nihilism, as aggressive neurocritical care may significantly attenuate predicted mortality.

Conclusion

ICH volume on CT scan is a robust, independent predictor of GCS score and neurological outcome. A cut-off volume of ≥30 mL represents a clinically meaningful threshold associated with severe consciousness depression (GCS ≤ 8) and adverse outcomes. Integration of both GCS and ICH volume into composite scoring (e.g., ICH Score, max-ICH Score) maximizes prognostic accuracy. Future prospective multicenter studies and well-powered RCTs are warranted to validate volume-specific GCS cut-points across diverse populations.

References

(1) Feigin VL, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):439-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1

(2) Morotti A, Goldstein JN. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2016;34(4):883-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2016.06.010

(3) Qureshi AI, et al. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(19):1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200105103441907

(4) Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-0

(5) Broderick JP, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update. Stroke. 2007;38(6):2001-2023. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.183689

(6) Kothari RU, et al. The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke. 1996;27(8):1304-1305. https://consensus.app/papers/details/cb512287804d5c5d9d08c58e29f463a6/

(7) Divani AA, et al. The ABCs of accurate volumetric measurement of cerebral hematoma. Stroke. 2011;42(6):1569-1574. https://consensus.app/papers/details/bdc27e1c7e585be78a75112f8627c9f9/

(8) Hemphill JC 3rd, et al. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32(4):891-897. https://consensus.app/papers/details/ceec430aee7451898e4a1e9957f0acc2/

(9) Weimer JM, et al. Clinical assessment tools in intracerebral hemorrhage. Semin Neurol. 2016;36(3):228-234. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583160

(10) Kellner CP, et al. The role of hematoma size and expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage. Semin Neurol. 2013;33(4):360-366. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1363363

(11) Hammerbeck U, et al. Hyperacute prediction of functional outcome in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Stroke J. 2022;7(3):183-195. https://consensus.app/papers/details/6cc12ee597ec59e29de5c15596e07a0a/

(12) Zhu W, et al. Predictors of early neurological deterioration in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2024;271(5):2345-2361. https://consensus.app/papers/details/57a1c7683657544c86a5f6d3ff88fde5/

(13) Parry-Jones AR, et al. Accuracy and clinical usefulness of intracerebral hemorrhage grading scores: a direct comparison in a UK population. Stroke. 2013;44(7):1840-1845. https://consensus.app/papers/details/f026824d29c45a5f9a53d327eac7abbe/

(14) Geest V, et al. How much of the variance in functional outcome related to intracerebral hemorrhage volume is already apparent in neurological status at admission? J Neurol. 2024;271(6):3200-3212. https://consensus.app/papers/details/b253ade9417d52ad923d056b70f60583/

(15) Morotti A, et al. Predictors of severe intracerebral hemorrhage expansion. Eur Stroke J. 2024;9(4):950-960. https://consensus.app/papers/details/c071811973b6502f89b39b806bc685c8/

(16) Dusenbury W, et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2023;3(2):e000655. https://consensus.app/papers/details/3d0691c51653554c8d3a727240f052e9/

(17) Meyrat R, et al. Enhanced prediction of in-hospital mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage: impact of serial neurological and radiological reassessment with the ICH Score at 6 hours postadmission. J Neurosurg. 2025;142(3):621-631. https://consensus.app/papers/details/dbbdae7a3e4158d98c657de08a192298/

(18) Teo K, et al. Location-specific hematoma volume cutoff and clinical outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2023;54(2):389-398. https://consensus.app/papers/details/4a8a84f7841259859f7396830e254659/

(19) Parry-Jones AR, et al. Accuracy and clinical usefulness of intracerebral hemorrhage grading scores: a direct comparison in a UK population. Stroke. 2013;44(7):1840-1845. https://consensus.app/papers/details/f026824d29c45a5f9a53d327eac7abbe/

(20) Morotti A, et al. Association between hematoma expansion severity and outcome and its interaction with baseline intracerebral hemorrhage volume. Neurology. 2023;100(5):e491-e500. https://consensus.app/papers/details/42f565b21a6c5b158fcc83d8e8ca4908/

(21) Morotti A, et al. Volume tolerance and prognostic impact of hematoma expansion in deep and lobar intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2025;56(1):87-97. https://consensus.app/papers/details/5c286ae6307c5b24b69bf20f0f795436/

(22) Webb AJ, et al. Accuracy of the ABC/2 score for intracerebral hemorrhage: systematic review and analysis of MISTIE, CLEAR-IVH, CLEAR III. Stroke. 2015;46(9):2470-2476. https://consensus.app/papers/details/040321114f745ef084ece4c08ada9c70/

(23) Huttner HB, et al. Comparison of ABC/2 estimation technique to computer-assisted planimetric analysis in warfarin-related intracerebral parenchymal hemorrhage. Stroke. 2006;37(2):404-408. https://consensus.app/papers/details/203e1074733e57d898c4cfe68cd295a7/

(24) Hammerbeck U, et al. Hyperacute prediction of functional outcome in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Stroke J. 2022;7(3):183-195. https://consensus.app/papers/details/6cc12ee597ec59e29de5c15596e07a0a/

(25) Zhu W, et al. Predictors of early neurological deterioration in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2024;271(5):2345-2361. https://consensus.app/papers/details/57a1c7683657544c86a5f6d3ff88fde5/

(26) Kuohn LK, et al. Early deterioration, hematoma expansion, and outcomes in deep versus lobar intracerebral hemorrhage: the FAST Trial. Stroke. 2022;53(3):706-714. https://consensus.app/papers/details/59e9f7b9fd585fbf935aade4c309c153/

(27) Ironside N, et al. Location-specific differences in hematoma volume predict outcomes in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Int J Stroke. 2020;15(3):293-302. https://consensus.app/papers/details/360c1dc347625b778b9cfd6d5cd93c9f/

(28) Li Q, et al. Island sign: an imaging predictor for early hematoma expansion and poor outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2017;48(11):3019-3025. https://consensus.app/papers/details/692c969697bf55f99cd8f9d247402be2/

(29) You S, et al. Optimum baseline clinical severity scale cut points for prognosticating intracerebral hemorrhage: INTERACT studies. Stroke. 2023;54(2):399-407. https://consensus.app/papers/details/4a905cfa073a5c6eafc0aba2b00ce99b/

(30) Morgenstern LB. Prognosis after intracerebral hemorrhage is uncertain, so why not do everything? Ann Neurol. 2019;86(4):473-475. https://consensus.app/papers/details/74c73113cc3d54fb85c46eea410a440b/

(31) Tilling E, et al. Do clinicians overestimate the severity of intracerebral hemorrhage? Stroke. 2019;50(12):3395-3401. https://consensus.app/papers/details/eef01bb15aaa529a9082ca0867046436/

(32) Gregson BA, et al. Surgical decision making in brain hemorrhage. Stroke. 2019;50(5):1108-1115. https://consensus.app/papers/details/9ff472e4620c5f848b1ad4501a4edb7a/

(33) Wilson D, et al. Outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage associated with different oral anticoagulants. Neurology. 2017;88(18):1693-1700. https://consensus.app/papers/details/f172f6e523f25a24be7ee5698cc1ce73/

(34) Boulouis G, et al. Non-contrast CT hypodensities predict poor outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage patients. Stroke. 2016;47(10):2511-2516. https://consensus.app/papers/details/ad10cf163b4b5f5e9488c185d4882ceb/

(35) Cindea CN, et al. Surgical versus conservative management of supratentorial ICH: a single-center retrospective analysis (2017–2023). J Clin Med. 2025;14(4):1201. https://consensus.app/papers/details/d52f2703d197521881e372f82b474dd6/

(36) Nguyen L, et al. Real-world surgical outcomes of primary intracerebral hemorrhage in a provincial stroke center in Vietnam. Eur Stroke J. 2026;11(Suppl):S201. https://consensus.app/papers/details/560c7801666959808e45972c3ae13ec0/

(37) Morotti A, et al. Association between hematoma expansion severity and outcome and its interaction with baseline intracerebral hemorrhage volume. Neurology. 2023;100(5):e491-e500. https://consensus.app/papers/details/42f565b21a6c5b158fcc83d8e8ca4908/

(38) Dierksen F, et al. Peri-hematomal edema shape features related to 3-month outcome in acute supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Eur Stroke J. 2024;9(2):410-419. https://consensus.app/papers/details/2889671e20df54e0a4b20be9bce22780/

(39) Colmer N, et al. Validity of intracerebral haemorrhage volume assessment: comparison of fully automated segmentation analysis with manual ABC/2 and semi-automated measurement. Eur Stroke J. 2026;11(1):72-81. https://consensus.app/papers/details/483bbf64cb6c5c40985bace97bba6009/

(40) Hales CM, et al. American Stroke Association/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2022;53(7):e282-e361. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000407

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28

How to Cite

Novita Lusiana. 2026. “Relationship Between Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume on CT Scan and Glasgow Coma Scale Score: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Primary Studies”. The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research 48 (3): 228-64. https://doi.org/10.70070/8f24qw51.