A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF REGIONAL SCALP BLOCK IN CRANIOTOMY ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND INTRAOPERATIVE HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE
Keywords:
scalp block, scalp nerve block, craniotomy, regional anaesthesia, postoperative pain, haemodynamic response, skull-pin insertion, opioid-sparing analgesia, neuroanaesthesia, systematic review, meta-analysisAbstract
Introduction: Craniotomy is followed by moderate-to-severe surgical-site pain in a majority of patients, yet analgesia in this population is constrained by the need to preserve neurological assessment and to avoid opioid-induced hypercapnia and intracranial hypertension. Skull-pin (Mayfield) fixation, scalp incision, and craniotomy each generate an abrupt sympathetic discharge that raises arterial pressure and heart rate, with potential consequences for cerebral perfusion pressure, aneurysm transmural tension, and haemorrhage risk. Regional scalp block offers a physiologically rational solution that addresses both problems with a single intervention.
Methods: The study strictly adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines Randomised controlled trials and primary comparative studies evaluating regional scalp block against placebo, no block, local infiltration, or systemic analgesia in patients undergoing craniotomy were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias appraisal using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, with certainty of evidence rated by GRADE. Random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian-Laird estimator generated mean differences, standardised mean differences, and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals across sixteen prespecified outcome domains.
Results: Forty-one studies comprising 2,984 participants (1,587 block, 1,397 comparator) were included; 38 were randomised controlled trials. Regional scalp block produced a large and statistically robust reduction in early postoperative pain at 1-2 hours (mean difference −1.74 points; 95% CI −2.07 to −1.42; I²=42%; P<0.0001) that persisted at 6-8 hours (−1.35; 95% CI −1.72 to −0.99; P<0.0001), 24 hours (−0.81; 95% CI −1.04 to −0.57; P<0.0001), and 48 hours (−0.48; 95% CI −0.76 to −0.20; P<0.001). Haemodynamic protection was pronounced at the most noxious stimulus: mean arterial pressure at skull-pin insertion fell by 14.24 mmHg (95% CI −17.24 to −11.25; P<0.0001) and heart rate by 11.19 beats·min⁻¹ (95% CI −13.87 to −8.50; P<0.0001), with attenuated but still significant effects at skin incision (−9.46 mmHg and −8.89 beats·min⁻¹, both P<0.0001). Intraoperative opioid consumption was substantially reduced (SMD −1.03; 95% CI −1.25 to −0.80; P<0.0001), as was 24-hour consumption (−16.66 mg; 95% CI −21.89 to −11.42; P<0.0001), while time to first rescue analgesia was prolonged by 2.91 hours (95% CI 2.03 to 3.79; P<0.0001). Block reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83; P<0.001), intraoperative hypertensive responses (RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.49; P<0.0001), and persistent incisional pain at 2-3 months (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.93; P=0.025). Serum cortisol (SMD −0.80; 95% CI −1.10 to −0.51) and time to tracheal extubation (−4.08 minutes; 95% CI −5.74 to −2.42) both favoured block. All sixteen outcome domains reached statistical significance in favour of regional scalp block. Meta-regression identified local anaesthetic concentration as the dominant modifier of analgesic magnitude (β=−2.18 points per 1% w/v; P<0.0001; 84% of τ² explained), and an Emax model estimated a half-maximal effective concentration of 0.163% ropivacaine-equivalent. Exploratory summary ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.753 for freedom from moderate-to-severe pain at 24 hours and 0.726 for absence of a hypertensive pinning response. No case of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity, seizure, or permanent neurological injury attributable to the block was reported in 1,587 exposed patients. Funnel plots were symmetrical (Egger P=0.53) and GRADE certainty was high for haemodynamic outcomes and moderate for most analgesic outcomes.
Conclusion: Regional scalp block delivers clinically meaningful, statistically robust, and internally consistent benefit across analgesic, haemodynamic, opioid-sparing, neuroendocrine, recovery, and safety domains in patients undergoing craniotomy. Pre-incisional blockade with a long-acting amide local anaesthetic at a concentration of at least 0.5% ropivacaine-equivalent, optionally supplemented with dexmedetomidine or a corticosteroid, should be considered a default component of enhanced recovery pathways for cranial neurosurgery.
References
Duda T, Lannon M, Gandhi P, Martyniuk A, Farrokhyar F, Sharma S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for scalp block in craniotomy. Neurosurgery. 2023;93(1):4–23. doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000002381
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/a004c1f60d225a65bb0700885b4050a5/
Guilfoyle MR, Helmy A, Duane D, Hutchinson PJA. Regional scalp block for postcraniotomy analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(5):1093–102. doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3182863c22
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/4129440d46ea5dca8ac147af067d5608/
Pinosky ML, Fishman RL, Reeves ST, Harvey SC, Patel S, Palesch Y, et al. The effect of bupivacaine skull block on the hemodynamic response to craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1996;83(6):1256–61. doi:10.1097/00000539-199612000-00022
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/0d3df93987a6528ba1efc565e7c688da/
Nguyen A, Girard F, Boudreault D, Fugère F, Ruel M, Moumdjian R, et al. Scalp nerve blocks decrease the severity of pain after craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(5):1272–6. doi:10.1097/00000539-200111000-00048
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/0691334366dc5a02b64b2cac53676fcd/
Biswas BK, Bithal PK. Preincision 0.25% bupivacaine scalp infiltration and postcraniotomy pain: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2003;15(3):234–7. doi:10.1097/00008506-200307000-00011
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/e9e5e23dd0c65542874eb211903fe3a8/
Mathieu D, Beaudry M, Martin R, Bourque P, Dagenais M. Effect of the local anesthetic agent bupivacaine prior to application of the skull-pin holder for craniotomies. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(6):1194–7. doi:10.3171/jns.2003.98.6.1194
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/3d1dbd090d105f1688d77a62092072ac/
Law-Koune JD, Szekely B, Fermanian C, Peuch C, Liu N, Fischler M. Scalp infiltration with bupivacaine plus epinephrine or plain ropivacaine reduces postoperative pain after supratentorial craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005;17(3):139–43. doi:10.1097/01.ana.0000171730.41008.da
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/e16e02a23c9050d2970efdb7403d89dd/
Lee EJ, Lee MY, Shyr MH, Cheng JT, Toung TJ, Mirski MA, et al. Adjuvant bupivacaine scalp block facilitates stabilization of hemodynamics in patients undergoing craniotomy with general anesthesia: a preliminary report. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18(7):490–4. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.02.014
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/ddd0508f3c115ea0a737cb7ffe27843e/
Gazoni FM, Pouratian N, Nemergut EC. Effect of ropivacaine skull block on perioperative outcomes in patients with supratentorial brain tumors and comparison with remifentanil: a pilot study. J Neurosurg. 2008;109(1):44–9. doi:10.3171/jns/2008/109/7/0044
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/32f96716e14350c3b9ddc2b3570cc1c3/
Batoz H, Verdonck O, Pellerin C, Roux G, Maurette P. The analgesic properties of scalp infiltrations with ropivacaine after intracranial tumoral resection. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(1):240–4. doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a4928d
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/d4e9438c02f250dba2f2efed25b79d65/
Geze S, Yilmaz AA, Tuzuner F. The effect of scalp block and local infiltration on the haemodynamic and stress response to skull-pin placement for craniotomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(4):298–303. doi:10.1097/eja.0b013e32831aedb2
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/fb1fb71a390e534299c3838e10d73eed/
Hwang JY, Bang JS, Oh CW, Joo JD, Park SJ, Do SH, et al. Effect of scalp blocks with levobupivacaine on recovery profiles after craniotomy for aneurysm clipping: a randomized, double-blind, and controlled study. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(1):108–13. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.05.009
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/d2c8814fd2e25d3eb4ceb788471ba5d4/
Abbass OA, Abdel Rahman MA, El Sayed AM. Does scalp block with general anesthesia in craniotomy affect the intraoperative course and outcome in geriatric patients? Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol. 2015;8(1):27–32. doi:10.4103/1687-7934.153934
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/c0ff20b47c485f679527771542691e4c/
Chaki T, Sugino S, Janicki PK, Ishioka Y, Hatakeyama Y, Hayase T, et al. Efficacy and safety of a lidocaine and ropivacaine mixture for scalp nerve block and local infiltration anesthesia in patients undergoing awake craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2016;28(1):1–5. doi:10.1097/ana.0000000000000149
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/9142a68f0b7c52e69ea1f2728ec3a671/
Krauss P, Marahori NA, Oertel MF, Barth F, Stieglitz LH. Better hemodynamics and less antihypertensive medication: comparison of scalp block and local infiltration anesthesia for skull-pin placement in awake deep brain stimulation surgery. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e991–9. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.210
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/fe1ef76f798f50188cd570f9d6473a6d/
Yang X, Ma J, Li K, Chen L, Dong R, Lu Y, et al. A comparison of effects of scalp nerve block and local anesthetic infiltration on inflammatory response, hemodynamic response, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral aneurysms: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):91. doi:10.1186/s12871-019-0760-4
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/88b97d1acf7f52ea814fd1dc57b424f5/
Carella M, Tran G, Bonhomme VL, Franssen C. Influence of levobupivacaine regional scalp block on hemodynamic stability, intra- and postoperative opioid consumption in supratentorial craniotomies: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2021;132(2):500–11. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000005230
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/5430a9636fc05b3a914bca9b045d1705/
Kulikov A, Tere V, Sergi PG, Bilotta F. Pre- versus postoperative scalp block combined with incision line infiltration for pain control after supratentorial craniotomy. Clin J Pain. 2021;37(3):194–8. doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000905
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/a879dc3dfb67522ebf6fcb22cad7e33e/
Yang Y, Ou M, Zhou H, Tan L, Hu Y, Li Y, et al. Effect of scalp nerve block with ropivacaine on postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy: a randomized, double blinded study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):2529. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59370-z
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/d2d2597c81bf57e79eaa49aa329523bc/
Gaudray E, Sadoughi Y, Bordes J, Prunet B, Meaudre E, Kaiser E, et al. Efficacy of scalp nerve blocks using ropivacaïne 0.75% associated with intravenous dexamethasone for postoperative pain relief in craniotomies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020;197:106125. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106125
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/70c8cbf1458a56a7a9577cf42fcb4825/
Mostafa RH, Saleh AN, Hussein MM. Effect of scalp block on postoperative nausea and vomiting and recovery profile after craniotomy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2020;5(4):220–7. doi:10.22037/jcma.v5i4.32015
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/9b1c7d350abb53b4be5f8fba295427dc/
Hussien ABM, Elsayed HM, Shaaban AR, Ali WN. Preoperative regional scalp block versus intraoperative intravenous fentanyl for attenuating intraoperative surgical stress response to supratentorial craniotomy in adult patients under general anaesthesia. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2020;11(4):5238–45. doi:10.26452/ijrps.v11i4.3802
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/a2f48756812350acbc2ddd84baccf148/
Suryadani RI, Kusuma H, Airlangga PS. Comparison of general anesthesia and combined scalp block with ropivacaine 0.5% on mean arterial pressure, heart rate and fentanyl consumption during craniotomy. J Widya Med. 2020;6(1):33–41. doi:10.33508/jwm.v6i1.2499
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/574d3e75ae95556b91dbafd3eead27bd/
Sindhu P, Punjasawadwong Y, Pin-on P. Comparison of analgesic effect of levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine and levobupivacaine for scalp block before supratentorial craniotomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2020;103(10):1041–7. doi:10.35755/jmedassocthai.2020.10.11547
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/0003516e94b15dce9eb5d5252efb4d3c/
Skutulienė J, Banevičius G, Bilskienė D, Macas A. The effect of scalp block or local wound infiltration versus systemic analgesia on post-craniotomy pain relief. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022;164(5):1375–9. doi:10.1007/s00701-021-04886-0
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/a3095c5b008b539d90a74a4f34e6339d/
Han X, Ren T, Wang Y, Ji N, Luo F. Postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of ropivacaine plus Diprospan for preemptive scalp infiltration in patients undergoing craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2022;135(6):1253–61. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000005971
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/6b67a149638b59a6a2237a5f3ad208fb/
Ning L, Jiang L, Zhang Q, Luo M, Xu D, Peng Y. Effect of scalp nerve block with ropivacaine on postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:952064. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.952064
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/536cee1db10058f8b8adfe9d75df9f4e/
Zeng M, Dong J, Lin N, Zhang W, Zhang K, Peng K, et al. Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block reduces opioid consumption in patients undergoing craniotomy via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023;48(1):8–14. doi:10.1136/rapm-2022-103534
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/2f176d18891659d3afa5ff0fb62fa3af/
Bala R, Kumar R, Rani S, Sharma J, Verma R. A comparative study of intravenous dexmedetomidine with local infiltration of ropivacaine in attenuation of stress response to skull pin insertion in craniotomies. Asian J Neurosurg. 2022;17(3):429–35. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1757221
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/b5dc0aa171275cde933240cce968db32/
Chrysoula S, Vasilios G, Anastasia T, Eleni M, Dimitrios V, Chryssa P. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to scalp block in patients undergoing elective craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023;228:107669. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107669
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/c9b1276a81cd579ba2c93a0f2f54aefd/
Lee EK, Seo H, Kim HJ, Cho HS, Kim JH, Lee SM, et al. The efficacy of scalp nerve block in postoperative pain management after microvascular decompression: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2023;12(13):4242. doi:10.3390/jcm12134242
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/100ae3291e665bdda3c112163d4f4495/
Maharani ND, Oktaliansah E, Fuadi I, Bisri DY, Bisri T. Comparison of the effect of scalp block analgesia bupivacaine 0.25% and clonidine 2 μg/kg with bupivacaine 0.25% and dexamethasone 8 mg on cortisol levels and Numeric Rating Scale in craniotomy tumour. Med J Malaysia. 2023;78(6):769–75.
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/056d5c59c61f53aca21bf464a3467e55/
Sharif M, Khan MI, Shah SA, Rehman A, Ahmad S. Effectiveness of scalp nerves block in reducing the immediate postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy in elective neurosurgical procedures. Ann PIMS. 2023;19(3):289–94. doi:10.48036/apims.v19i3.794
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/8f0b4a10b34c53d4b7c8df0a489aca76/
Moharari RS, Sanatkar M, Espahbodi E, Pourfakhr P, Khajavi MR, Etezadi F, et al. Scalp nerve block for enhanced pain control and analgesic optimization in elective craniotomy: a randomized controlled trial with ANI monitoring. World Neurosurg. 2024;188:e402–9. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.144
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/bfe4ba74adbb5383935d288e00a6fcac/
Zhang Y, Liu H, Wang L, Li J. Role of scalp nerve block in improving the quality of rehabilitation in patients after meningioma resection: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(22):e38324. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000038324
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/1c359c70a18e59fc8aa58752bf2797af/
Xiong W, Li L, Bao D, Wang Y, Liang Y, Lu P, et al. Effect of scalp nerve block on postcraniotomy analgesia in children: a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024;24(1):444. doi:10.1186/s12871-024-02822-0
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/7e8c4e22c5995f84b51eb42c519f3861/
Elzeftawy DA, Hassan AM, Abdelhamid BM, Mahmoud SA. The effect of preemptive scalp block in supratentorial brain tumor excision surgery: a prospective randomized controlled double blinded study. Int J Med Anesthesiol. 2024;7(4):175–81. doi:10.33545/26643766.2024.v7.i4c.530
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/25ddbfaf180550bdac82c625c0026d4c/
Priyadarshini B, Reddy KS, Rao MH. A prospective, randomized study comparing the analgesic efficacy of scalp block with 0.25% bupivacaine versus pre-incisional local infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline (1:400 000) in patients undergoing elective craniotomies. Int J Adv Res. 2024;12(6):712–21. doi:10.21474/ijar01/19083
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/2225a2e9d67251eda8fb7931c7306cd6/
Zeng M, Xu M, Li X, Li S, Wang D, Peng Y, et al. Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus blocks for persistent pain after suboccipital craniotomies: a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2025;142(2):289–99. doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000005238
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/6328b3e7ebf159cf8481a7e2aca1d108/
Kadian S, Panda N, Bhagat H, Chauhan R, Luthra A, Soni SL, et al. Comparative evaluation of analgesic efficacy of ketamine and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to bupivacaine for scalp block in supratentorial craniotomy: a randomized, double-blind clinical study. J Clin Neurosci. 2025;135:111347. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111347
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/508db73061655da28ba811d9eacf6e8b/
Qi J, Chen Y, Wang X, Zhang H, Wu J, Zhou J. Combined betamethasone and ropivacaine for scalp nerve block for patients undergoing elective craniotomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2025; Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1097/ana.0000000000001072
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/2e6630df63fe53ccbc18faf3d3190b01/
Sharma L, Luthra A, Chauhan R, Panda NB, Bhagat H, Soni SL. Comparison of the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to ropivacaine for scalp nerve block in patients undergoing awake craniotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2025;253:109223. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109223
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/ffb1e563c42657a1a5b8d50321b73898/
Afprimadhona A, Rizal A, Theodorus. The comparison of the effectiveness of additional scalp block bupivacaine 0.125% with bupivacaine 0.25% on hemodynamic responses in patients undergoing craniotomy. J Neuroanestesi Indones. 2025;14(3):161–70. doi:10.24244/jni.v14i3.647
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/4eef2f952db751e2bc8a6f2eb13d50f3/
Luo M, Zhao X, Deng M, Hu Y, Yang X, Mei Z, et al. The effectiveness of scalp nerve block on hemodynamic response in craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022;88(7–8):588–99. doi:10.23736/s0375-9393.22.16775-1
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/5fb3c73296725f9b9a171b6178101080/
Chen Y, Ni J, Li X, Zhou J, Chen G. Scalp block for postoperative pain after craniotomy: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Front Surg. 2022;9:1018511. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.1018511
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/96cc9c6275965887b930af8acf971833/
Fu PH, Hung KC, Chen JY, Chang YJ, Chen IW, Sun CK. Association of scalp block with intraoperative hemodynamic profiles and postoperative pain outcomes at 24–48 hours following craniotomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Pain Pract. 2022;22(7):697–708. doi:10.1111/papr.13167
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/c7976d270b175098add6ba116d2d1d79/
Wei X, Liu L, Zhang Y, Wang H. The effect of scalp nerve block on postoperative analgesia and stress response in patients undergoing craniotomy: a meta-analysis. Altern Ther Health Med. 2024;30(9):138–46.
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/b522763f0a9e5b61b60fa75a0c10c6c1/
Galvin IM, Levy R, Day AG, Gilron I. Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults following brain surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019(11):CD011931. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011931.pub2
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/ffd753cc89ae5a678ddd87ac8d2fe481/
De Gray LC, Matta BF. Acute and chronic pain following craniotomy: a review. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(7):693–704. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.03997.x
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/1673aed6450753e48ad236a631a4b58a/
Trindade JGS, Silva LFA, Oliveira MC, Santos RF. Influence of scalp nerve block on analgesia and hemodynamic stability in pediatric patients: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2025;48(1):287. doi:10.1007/s10143-025-03690-z
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/cbf0929e10cd554891c3e8d8e12e0cb5/
Costello TG, Cormack JR, Hoy C, Wyss A, Braniff V, Martin K, et al. Plasma ropivacaine levels following scalp block for awake craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2004;16(2):147–50. doi:10.1097/00008506-200404000-00007
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/c5a92a28100958e79718ddf7ae93c7f7/
Costello TG, Cormack JR, Mather LE, LaFerlita B, Murphy MA, Harris K. Plasma levobupivacaine concentrations following scalp block in patients undergoing awake craniotomy. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(6):848–51. doi:10.1093/bja/aei135
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/e780def4961b579c8db50a9b7ab03b5e/
Sato T, Ando A, Asano Y, Mori D, Motomura K, Nishiwaki K. Serum concentration of ropivacaine after repeated administration to several parts of the head during awake craniotomy: a prospective cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:834334. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.834334
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/1998f9cfe394536eb14b4f8ed75ebfdd/
Harbers JBM, Beems T, Nijhuis GMM, van Egmond J, Gielen MJM. A case of temporary facial nerve palsy after regional anesthesia of the scalp. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(6):1375–6. doi:10.1213/00000539-199812000-00030
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/99312cea84db55ddb30c8afbf59b16b6/
Sriganesh K, Bharadwaj S, Wang M, Abdelmalik PA, Wilson JRF, Venkataramaiah S. Opioid versus non-opioid analgesia for craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurg. 2023;172:e194–204. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.111
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/8b23cefbdefe53f7aca44a9b23268693/
Viderman D, Aubakirova M, Sadir N, Abdildin YG. Perioperative dexmedetomidine for pain management in craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2024;190:e330–41. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.034
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/604a3d945e2b57959018a6052e47ec07/
Zeng M, Xu M, Wang D, Li S, Peng Y. Dexmedetomidine prevents chronic incisional pain after brain tumor resection: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2023;137(4):857–65. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000006563
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/45343a4ce0445156a202975a94b242a0/
Sudadi S, Setyawan AB, Ariyanto H, Wibowo T. Comparative efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion block versus scalp block for hemodynamic stability during craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025;25(1):318. doi:10.1186/s12871-025-03523-y
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/63a3ef08a3935affa81994aabe2f1452/
Sivakumar W, Jensen M, Martinez J, Tanana M, Duncan N, Hoareau G, et al. Intravenous acetaminophen for postoperative supratentorial craniotomy pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Neurosurg. 2019;130(2):427–33. doi:10.3171/2017.10.jns171464
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/6b70cf567e45596a90c56397e6bef525/
Li F, Zhang W, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen H. Effects of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine or ropivacaine alone on duration of postoperative analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2023;18(6):e0287296. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287296
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/c4a4fa3f54a1564282c5916f36779aa6/
Xuan C, Yan W, Wang D, Li C, Ma H, Mueller A, et al. The facilitatory effects of adjuvant pharmaceutics to prolong the duration of local anesthetic for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2021;133(3):620–9. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000005640
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/63a9497d2bce5fdbb5de507fd76f7e39/
Faiz MM, Luthra A, Chauhan R, Panda NB, Bhagat H, Soni SL. Comparison of the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine as an adjunct to ropivacaine for scalp nerve block during awake craniotomy surgery: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2026;26(1):12. doi:10.1186/s12871-026-04006-4
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/7d14b8da392d5d8bb5be0035dbed3295/
Kadowaki M, Yamaguchi T, Kawabata Y, Hori H, Taira T. Scalp nerve block alleviates headaches associated with sonication during transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. Neurosurgery. 2024;95(2):405–13. doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000002962
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/17df4d25f84a52b7880acd876bcd0c22/
Colley PS. Blunting the hemodynamic response to skull-pin placement. Anesth Analg. 1997;84(4):940. doi:10.1097/00000539-199704000-00056
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/9334b0d114b3563cbef12014915a1346/
Sarna R, Panda NB, Bhagat H, Chauhan R, Luthra A, Jangra K, et al. Sterile silicone studs: a non-pharmacological modality for prevention of hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion — a pilot study. World Neurosurg. 2023;178:e644–50. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.005
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/183d85d2064a5cf69e2bcd7c1a6cb264/
Costello TG, Cormack JR. Clonidine premedication decreases hemodynamic responses to pin head-holder application during craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(5):1001–4. doi:10.1097/00000539-199805000-00017
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/a8432f85370b5fb49693257e07ae1af9/
Tarimah K, Sudadi S, Wibowo T, Setyawan AB. Magnesium sulfate as a multimodal anesthetic adjuvant in brain tumor surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hemodynamic, analgesic, and biomarker outcomes. J Clin Med. 2026;15(12):4636. doi:10.3390/jcm15124636
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/cc24b698f63754ff96afaf45facbfc63/
Xiong W, Li L, Bao D, Wang Y, Liang Y, Lu P, et al. Postoperative analgesia of scalp nerve block with ropivacaine in pediatric craniotomy patients: a protocol for a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):580. doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04524-7
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/04b4292ada9d50e299f15ea8c243188c/
Kara AK, Ozturk E, Gulec H, Akcil EF, Vehid H, Tunali Y. Efficacy of selective scalp nerve blocks for postoperative pain in craniotomy: a single-center experience. Agri. 2025;37(1):55–60. doi:10.14744/agri.2023.93708
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/309329a21832527aa4c860112b2bfb0b/
Pin-on P, Punjasawadwong Y, Chausuwan S. Effect of pre-incisional anterior scalp block on intraoperative opioid consumption in adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy to remove tumor: study protocol for a randomized double-blind trial. Asia Pac J Clin Trials Nerv Syst Dis. 2016;1(3):115–9. doi:10.4103/2468-5577.187079
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/47f27b07edb85dda83d5079d7b6a8c4e/
Peng K, Zeng M, Dong J, Yan X, Wang D, Li S, et al. Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block for analgesia in patients undergoing craniotomy via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e034003. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034003
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/700df4897dfa5546a92c76970fde9f06/
Zhao C, Jia Z, Shrestha N, Luo F. Pre-emptive scalp infiltration with ropivacaine plus methylprednisolone versus ropivacaine alone for relief of postoperative pain after craniotomy in children: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e027864. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027864
Consensus: https://consensus.app/papers/details/9fdce96e0d325e5f9000ecbc5d961401/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fhadiyyah Suriyandi, Christian Reza Wibowo (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing here keep copyright but grant the journal first publication rights, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License. They can distribute their work non-exclusively elsewhere with an acknowledgment of its first publication in this journal. Posting the work online before and during submission for earlier and greater citation is encouraged, reflecting Open Access benefits.
