EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION (TENS) IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AND PRIMARY STUDIES
Keywords:
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, chronic musculoskeletal pain, non-pharmacological analgesia, fibromyalgia, knee osteoarthritis, electrotherapyAbstract
Introduction: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is one of the leading causes of global disability, affecting more than 1.71 billion individuals worldwide and constituting a major burden on healthcare systems. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) is a widely utilized, non-invasive electrophysical modality that delivers low-voltage electrical current through cutaneous electrodes to modulate nociceptive transmission and activate endogenous analgesic mechanisms. Despite its broad clinical adoption, heterogeneity in study designs, patient populations, stimulation parameters, and outcome assessments has generated controversy regarding its efficacy. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence from primary studies investigating TENS efficacy across multiple musculoskeletal pain conditions, addressing the existing research gap on comparative effectiveness across diverse outcomes including pain intensity, physical function, quality of life, analgesic consumption, and psychosocial parameters. Methods: The study strictly adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary studies (randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, observational prospective and retrospective designs) evaluating TENS as an intervention in adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers using PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. Data were extracted on pain intensity (VAS/NRS), physical function (WOMAC, TUG, 6MWT), quality of life (SF-36), analgesic consumption, and adverse events. Results: 15 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Studies encompassed diverse musculoskeletal conditions including knee osteoarthritis (n=8), fibromyalgia (n=4), chronic neck pain (n=2), hemiplegic shoulder pain (n=1), chronic non-cancer pain (n=1), pudendal neuralgia (n=1), and subacute spinal spasticity (n=1). Active TENS demonstrated statistically significant superiority over sham/placebo TENS in reducing pain intensity (VAS/NRS) in the majority of studies, with standardized mean differences (SMD) ranging from -0.51 to -1.96. Functional outcomes including WOMAC scores, TUG test, and 6MWT showed meaningful improvements in TENS-treated groups across multiple conditions. Reduction in analgesic consumption was observed in several studies. Adverse events were minimal, generally mild, and predominantly local (skin erythema). Across 10 predefined outcome domains, TENS consistently demonstrated clinically meaningful effects in pain intensity reduction, movement-evoked pain, fatigue reduction, physical performance, and patient global impression of change. Discussion: The evidence synthesized in this review supports TENS as an effective, safe, and clinically applicable non-pharmacological modality for chronic musculoskeletal pain management. Efficacy was most robust for conditions involving peripheral nociceptive mechanisms including knee osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia. Optimal TENS parameters remain heterogeneous across studies; however, high-frequency TENS (80–100 Hz) and modulated-frequency protocols (2–125 Hz) demonstrated consistent analgesic effects. Combination with physiotherapy exercise programs and patient education enhanced outcomes. Methodological limitations include small sample sizes, short follow-up durations, and challenges in blinding participants to active TENS. Wearable and home-use TENS devices showed non-inferiority compared to weak opioids with superior safety profiles. Conclusion: TENS is an effective, safe, and guideline-concordant non-pharmacological intervention for chronic musculoskeletal pain. It significantly reduces pain intensity and improves physical function and quality of life while minimizing analgesic dependence. TENS should be considered as a first-line adjunctive modality in multimodal rehabilitation programs for chronic musculoskeletal pain.References
Johnson MI, Paley CA, Jones G, Mulvey MR, Wittkopf PG. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study). BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e051491. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/348549a51f0a5cbbadbb8388e6ed891f/
Johnson MI, Paley CA, Wittkopf PG, Mulvey MR, Jones G. The clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain: a protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e029999. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/f9fce99f3cc35f10b94e21bc8a6a4f2e/
Wu LC, Weng PW, Chen CH, Huang YY, Tsuang YH, Chiang CJ. Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Treating Chronic Back Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;43(4):425–433. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/413d45bae6b15919a64334da0f0b6f7c/
Viderman D, Tapinova K, Dzhaksybekov Y, Abdildin YG. The Impact of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Acute Pain and Other Postoperative Outcomes: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(3):780. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/5d0f20aa6928531f85a12983947936a0/
Wu Y, Zhu F, Chen W, Zhang M. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in people with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2021;36(4):472–485. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/449ad89ce3f750cf9dcf2ce8f6e762d9/
Palmer S, Domaille M, Cramp F, Walsh N, Pollock J, Kirwan J, et al. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation as an Adjunct to Education and Exercise for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(3):387–394. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/4eae5e8b5ac856e0b608fbda51335c70/
Dailey DL, Vance CGT, Rakel BA, Zimmerman MB, Embree J, Merriwether EN, et al. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Reduces Movement-Evoked Pain and Fatigue: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(5):824–836. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/4fac18026fa55860b7cf7e1021bf3d30/
Vance CGT, Rakel BA, Blodgett NP, DeSantana JM, Amendola A, Zimmerman MB, et al. Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain, Pain Sensitivity, and Function in People With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther. 2012;92(7):898–910. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/d4eb5b99c54a58e9af32d4de265360ec/
Shimoura K, Iijima H, Eguchi Y, Miyakoshi K, Aoyama T. Immediate Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain and Physical Performance in Individuals With Preradiographic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(2):300–306. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/b99a5708ab925564a7442db9f5f25155/
Zhou M, Li F, Lu W, Wu J, Pei S. Efficiency of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation on Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(9):1730–1739. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/5351adaea115519eb958583dc0d5a1fe/
Tonyé-Geoffroy L, Morel V, Picard P, Giraudet F, Malaure H, Coudert P, et al. Efficacy of a combination of hypnosis and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic non-cancer pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(3):809–821. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/2b7a9a23e320578ea8feecc41f118683/
Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Vance CGT, Liebano RE, Amrit AS, Bush HM, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of TENS for Movement-Evoked Pain in Women with Fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;72(6):824–836. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/b06b105c75855418b32ebdbcb907aabd/
Vance CGT, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Zimmerman MB, Bhavsar P, Merriwether EN, et al. Reduction in movement-evoked pain and fatigue during initial 30-minute TENS treatment predicts TENS responders in women with fibromyalgia. Pain. 2020;162(5):1280–1291. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/706f2fd0c0285964a6bfaff32edc1cdc/
Eid MM, Eid MA, Eid HM. Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as an adjunct to selected physical therapy exercise program on male patients with pudendal neuralgia: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021;36(3):324–334. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/68d23b28c27c514f88ae59aed3d2b401/
Maheu E, Soriot-Thomas S, Noel E, Lespessailles E, Cortet B, et al. Wearable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation demonstrated better efficacy and safety than weak opioids in the treatment of moderate to severe, chronic nociceptive pain in knee osteoarthritis: ArthroTENS study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(Suppl 1):POS0279. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/2a61e76cd9ea5827b6aef993c7987a0b/
Berardi G, Dailey DL, Vance CGT, Zimmerman MB, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Influence of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pressure pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation in a randomized controlled trial in women with fibromyalgia. J Pain. 2024;25(2):353–362. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/9cf88ab4c42f507caace42d1d9c16078/
Vishnevetsky A, Romanow N, Levy M. A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial of TENS Therapy for Neuropathic Pain in NMOSD. Neurology. 2023;100(17 Suppl 2):P13-5.005. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/6b1cfb6e7ac85c4eb9ba23ced3751853/
Díaz-Pulido B, Sánchez-Romero EA, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, et al. Efficacy of Manual Therapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Cervical Mobility and Endurance in Subacute and Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med. 2021;10(16):3479. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/530fd360c1295ec4beca96504ed64cc8/
Oo WM. Efficacy of addition of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to standardized physical therapy in subacute spinal spasticity: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(11):2013–2020. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/d9af7f171b035a44b4c9a000f672a319/
Rakel BA, Zimmerman MB, Geasland K, Embree J, Clark CR, Noiseux NO, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the control of pain during rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty. Pain. 2014;155(12):2599–2611. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/bb02e13f557e59fe92e289c0a919d24a/
Yamada K, Iijima H, Nakamura M, Adachi T, Aoyama T. Usefulness and safety of a wearable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device for promoting exercise therapy in patients with chronic knee pain: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;105(4):672–679. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/4c7dc1886dbc54c4aa5942ab950bc38e/
Noehren B, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Vance CGT, Zimmerman MB, Crofford LJ, et al. Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain, Function, and Quality of Life in Fibromyalgia: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Phys Ther. 2015;95(1):129–140. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/00b8a15607005009b7c358aa94a76ab7/
Post AA, Vance CGT, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Zimmerman MB, Sluka KA. The Fibromyalgia Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Physical Therapy Study (FM-TIPS) Protocol. Phys Ther. 2022;102(9):pzac074. Available from: https://consensus.app/papers/details/9a72cdb6717d5c8b91d65b09e5d49099/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wara Anung Anindita, Afiyf Kaysa Waafi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing here keep copyright but grant the journal first publication rights, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License. They can distribute their work non-exclusively elsewhere with an acknowledgment of its first publication in this journal. Posting the work online before and during submission for earlier and greater citation is encouraged, reflecting Open Access benefits.
