The Analysis Study of Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Breast Cancer : A Comprehensive Systematic Review
Keywords:
breast cancer, diagnosis, surgical managementAbstract
Background: Breast cancer remains a significant global health challenge, representing the most common malignancy among women and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence on the diagnosis and surgical management of breast cancer. Methods: The study followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, reviewing English-language publications from 2015 to 2025. Editorials, duplicate reviews from the same journal, and papers lacking a DOI were excluded. The literature search was conducted using PubMed, SagePub, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Result: A total of 2,172 articles were initially identified through online databases (PubMed, SagePub, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar). After three rounds of screening, eight relevant studies were selected for full-text analysis. Conclusion: Breast cancer diagnosis and surgery have evolved with advanced imaging, molecular profiling, and oncoplastic techniques, emphasizing patient-centered care. While mastectomy remains necessary in some cases, oncoplastic approaches offer safe, effective outcomes. Future research should refine techniques, staging, and therapeutic integration.
References
Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi PL, Raposio E. Oncoplastic breast surgery: comprehensive review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(11):2572-2585.
Houssami N, Turner RM, Morrow M. Meta-analysis of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165(2):273-283. doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4324-3
Keelan S, Flanagan M, Hill ADK. Evolving Trends in Surgical Management of Breast Cancer: An Analysis of 30 Years of Practice Changing Papers. Front Oncol. 2021;11. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.622621
Loh SY, Nadia A. Methods to improve rehabilitation of patients following breast cancer surgery: a review of systematic reviews. Breast Cancer Targets Ther. Published online March 2015:81. doi:10.2147/BCTT.S47012
Matthews H, Grunfeld EA, Turner A. The efficacy of interventions to improve psychosocial outcomes following surgical treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Psychosocial interventions following breast cancer surgery. Psychooncology. 2017;26(5):593-607. doi:10.1002/pon.4199
McDonald ES, Clark AS, Tchou J, Zhang P, Freedman GM. Clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(Supplement 1):9S-16S.
Olsson Möller U, Beck I, Rydén L, Malmström M. A comprehensive approach to rehabilitation interventions following breast cancer treatment - a systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):472. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5648-7
Rostami R, Mittal S, Rostami P, Tavassoli F, Jabbari B. Brain metastasis in breast cancer: a comprehensive literature review. J Neurooncol. 2016;127(3):407-414. doi:10.1007/s11060-016-2075-3
Jedy-Agba E, McCormack V, Adebamowo C, dos-Santos-Silva I. Stage at diagnosis of breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(12):e923-e935.
Jonczyk MM, Jean J, Graham R, Chatterjee A. Surgical trends in breast cancer: a rise in novel operative treatment options over a 12 year analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(2):267-274. doi:10.1007/s10549-018-5018-1
Simons JM, van Nijnatten TJ, van der Pol CC, Luiten EJ, Koppert LB, Smidt ML. Diagnostic accuracy of different surgical procedures for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in node-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019;269(3):432-442. Accessed February 23, 2025. https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/fulltext/2019/03000/Diagnostic_Accuracy_of_Different_Surgical.10.aspx
Huang N si, Liu M ying, Chen J jian, et al. Surgical management of breast cancer in China: A 15-year single-center retrospective study of 18,502 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(45):e4201. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000004201
Carter SA, Lyons GR, Kuerer HM, et al. Operative and Oncologic Outcomes in 9861 Patients with Operable Breast Cancer: Single-Institution Analysis of Breast Conservation with Oncoplastic Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3190-3198. doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5407-9
Crown A, Wechter DG, Grumley JW. Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Reduces Mastectomy and Postoperative Re-excision Rates. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(10):3363-3368. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4738-2
Fitzal F, Bolliger M, Dunkler D, et al. Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis Comparing Conventional with Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Oncological and Surgical Outcomes in Women with High-Risk Breast Cancer from the OPBC-01/iTOP2 Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(2):1061-1070. doi:10.1245/s10434-021-10809-1
Jafari SH, Saadatpour Z, Salmaninejad A, et al. Breast cancer diagnosis: Imaging techniques and biochemical markers. doi:10.1002/jcp.26379
Nounou MI, ElAmrawy F, Ahmed N, Abdelraouf K, Goda S, Syed-Sha-Qhattal H. Breast Cancer: Conventional Diagnosis and Treatment Modalities and Recent Patents and Technologies. Breast Cancer Basic Clin Res. 2015;9s2:BCBCR.S29420. doi:10.4137/BCBCR.S29420
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anindya Ryan Pramudya, Dewandaru Istighfaris Agadinata Bramanti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing here keep copyright but grant the journal first publication rights, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License. They can distribute their work non-exclusively elsewhere with an acknowledgment of its first publication in this journal. Posting the work online before and during submission for earlier and greater citation is encouraged, reflecting Open Access benefits.
