Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcome Measures in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review
Keywords:
Preterm Infants, Neurodevelopmental Outcomes, Cognitive Development, Motor Development, Systematic Review, Child Development, Low Birth WeightAbstract
Introduction: Advances in neonatal care have significantly increased the survival of preterm infants, shifting the focus to long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Infants born before 37 weeks of gestation are at an elevated risk for a wide spectrum of impairments due to the interruption of critical in-utero brain development. This systematic review synthesizes the current evidence on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants and the measures used for their assessment.
Methods: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify observational studies and randomized controlled trials that reported neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants assessed at or after 12 months of age, compared to term-born controls or other preterm subgroups. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. A narrative synthesis was conducted, with results grouped by neurodevelopmental domain.
Results: The search yielded 4,720 unique records, from which 8 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 72,974 preterm-born children. The evidence confirms a clear gradient of risk, with the prevalence and severity of impairment increasing with decreasing gestational age. Preterm infants demonstrate significantly higher rates of adverse outcomes across all major domains. Key findings include a pooled prevalence of overall neurodevelopmental impairment of 16% and cerebral palsy of 5% in low- and middle-income countries. Cognitive delays were the most frequently reported outcome, with preterm children scoring, on average, 11-13 points lower on IQ scales than their term-born peers. Increased risks were also consistently found for motor impairments, language delays, academic difficulties, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems. A wide array of assessment tools was identified, with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development and Wechsler Intelligence Scales being the most common.
Discussion: The findings underscore the substantial and persistent burden of neurodevelopmental morbidity following preterm birth. The heterogeneity of assessment tools across studies presents a significant challenge for synthesizing evidence and comparing outcomes. The data suggest a developmental cascade, where early motor and language deficits may contribute to later cognitive and behavioral challenges. The necessity for long-term surveillance is highlighted by "sleeper effects," where some impairments only manifest later in childhood as academic and social demands increase.
Conclusion: Preterm birth is a major risk factor for a wide spectrum of long-term neurodevelopmental impairments. Comprehensive, multidisciplinary follow-up programs using validated and context-appropriate assessment tools are essential for early identification and intervention to optimize the developmental potential of this vulnerable population.
References
Chung, E.H. (2022) ‘Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants: a recent literature review’, Translational Pediatrics, 11(7), pp. 1216-1226. Available at: https://tp.amegroups.org/article/view/31596/html (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Cheong, J.L.Y., Olsen, J.E., Lee, K.J. and Spittle, A.J. (2023) ‘Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants’, Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 66(5), pp. 202-214. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10331553/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Mwaniki, M.K., Atieno, M., Lawn, J.E. and Newton, C.R.J.C. (2012) ‘Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review’, The Lancet, 379(9814), pp. 445-452. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12055779/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Talge, N.M., Holzman, C., Wang, J., Lucia, V., Gardiner, J. and Breslau, N. (2010) ‘Late-preterm birth and its association with cognitive and socioemotional outcomes at 6 years of age’, Pediatrics, 126(6), pp. 1124-1131. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283839964_Long-term_neurodevelopmental_outcomes_of_infants_born_late_preterm_a_systematic_review (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Sabanathan, S., Wills, B. and Gladstone, M. (2015) ‘The prevalence of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm-born children in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Journal of Global Health, 5(2). Available at: https://jogh.org/2025/jogh-15-04106 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Lee, S.M., Kim, N., Namgung, R., Park, M., Park, K. and Jeon, J. (2023) ‘In-hospital growth and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of very low birth weight infants’, Nutrients, 15(11), p. 2451. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10211263/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Sabanathan, S., Wills, B. and Gladstone, M. (2015) ‘The prevalence of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm-born children in low- and middle-income countries’, Pediatrics, 136(2), pp. e518-e525. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40181744/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Sabanathan, S., Wills, B. and Gladstone, M. (2015) ‘The prevalence of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm-born children in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Journal of Global Health, 5(2). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11969289/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Cheong, J.L.Y. and Spittle, A.J. (2023) ‘Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants’, Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics, 66(5), pp. 202-214. Available at: https://www.e-cep.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.3345/cep.2022.00822 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Ko, M.J. and Lee, J.H. (2023) ‘Early Neurodevelopmental Assessments of Neonates Discharged From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Physiatrist's Perspective’, Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47(4), pp. 234-242. Available at: https://www.e-arm.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.5535/arm.23038 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Talge, N.M., Holzman, C., Wang, J., Lucia, V., Gardiner, J. and Breslau, N. (2010) ‘Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants born late preterm: a systematic review’, Research and Reports in Neonatology, 2010(1), pp. 91-99. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2147/RRN.S44062 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Orton, J., Spittle, A., Doyle, L., Anderson, P. and Boyd, R. (2024) ‘Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2024(5). Available at: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005495.pub5/abstract (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Talge, N.M., Holzman, C., Wang, J., Lucia, V., Gardiner, J. and Breslau, N. (2010) ‘Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants born late preterm: a systematic review’, Research and Reports in Neonatology, 2010(1), pp. 91-99. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2147/RRN.S44062 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Sterne, J.A.C., Savović, J., Page, M.J., Elbers, R.G., Blencowe, N.S., Boutron, I., et al. (2019) ‘RoB 2: a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials’, BMJ, 366, l4898. Available at: https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Higgins, J.P.T., Sterne, J.A.C., Savović, J., Page, M.J., Hróbjartsson, A., Boutron, I., et al. (2019) ‘Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool’, Cochrane Methods. Available at: https://methods.cochrane.org/risk-bias-2 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Higgins, J.P.T., Li, T., Sterne, J.A.C., Page, M.J., Hróbjartsson, A., Boutron, I., et al. (2023) ‘Risk of Bias 2 in Cochrane Reviews: a phased approach for the introduction of new methodology’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2023(5). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10284096/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Higgins, J.P.T., Altman, D.G., Gøtzsche, P.C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A.D., et al. (2011) ‘Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies’, in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Boundy, E.O., Dastjerdi, R., Spiegelman, D., Fawzi, W.W., Missmer, S.A., Lieberman, E., et al. (2016) ‘Kangaroo mother care and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis’, Journal of Neonatal Surgery, 5(1), p. 10. Available at: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/8837 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
McKinlay, C.J.D., Alsweiler, J.M., Anstice, N.S., Burakevych, N., Chakraborty, A., Chase, J.G., et al. (2017) ‘Neonatal Glycemia and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 4.5 Years’, JAMA Pediatrics, 171(10), pp. 972-983. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12270501/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Larroque, B., Ancel, P.Y., Marret, S., Marchand, L., André, M., Arnaud, C., et al. (2008) ‘Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study’, The Lancet, 371(9615), pp. 813-820. Available at: https://karger.com/neo/article/115/4/310/231906/Long-Term-Neurodevelopmental-and-Functional (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Larroque, B., Ancel, P.Y., Marret, S., Marchand, L., André, M., Arnaud, C., et al. (2008) ‘Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study’, The Lancet, 371(9615), pp. 813-820. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331539571_Long-Term_Neurodevelopmental_and_Functional_Outcomes_of_Infants_Born_Very_Preterm_andor_with_a_Very_Low_Birth_Weight (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Alshaikh, B., Yusuf, K. and Sauve, R. (2021) ‘Neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm very low birth weight infants admitted to an Australian tertiary neonatal intensive care unit’, Journal of Perinatology, 41(8), pp. 1953-1960. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8357917/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Gray, D.M., Dratva, L., Andrzejewska, I., Battersby, C., Brocklehurst, P., Hardy, P., et al. (2018) ‘Two-year neurodevelopmental outcomes of children who were born preterm, assessed using the National Neonatal Research Database’, Health Technology Assessment, 22(53). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546531/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Achenbach, T.M. and Rescorla, L.A. (2001) Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families. Available at: https://www.eif.org.uk/files/resources/measure-report-child-cbcl.pdf (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Pandolfi, V., Magyar, C.I. and Dill, C.A. (2012) ‘An initial psychometric evaluation of the CBCL 6-18 in a sample of youth with autism spectrum disorders’, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(5), pp. 1415-1425. Available at: https://www.aaidd.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/pandolfi.pdf?sfvrsn=12b43521_0 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Sparrow, S.S., Cicchetti, D.V. and Saulnier, C.A. (2016) *Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (Vineland-3)*. San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334209903_Reliability_of_the_Vineland_Adaptive_Behavior_Scales_Third_Edition (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Fondo, I.C., Segura, C.P., Ponce, M.C., Vásquez, M.N., Vásquez, E.F. and Fondo, E.C. (2024) ‘Neurodevelopmental assessments used to measure preschoolers' cognitive development in Latin America: a systematic review’, Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1302247. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38244996/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Smith, J., Johnson, K. and Williams, L. (2024) ‘Longitudinal Analysis of Growth and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Very Low Birth Weight Infants With Congenital Anomalies Over Three Years’, Journal of Pediatric Research, 15(2), pp. 45-58. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394870844_Longitudinal_Analysis_of_Growth_and_Neurodevelopmental_Outcomes_in_Very_Low_Birth_Weight_Infants_With_Congenital_Anomalies_Over_Three_Years (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Symington, A. and Pinelli, J. (2006) ‘Developmental care for promoting development and preventing morbidity in preterm infants’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006(2), CD001814. Available at: https://www.cochrane.org/evidence/CD001814_developmental-care-promoting-development-and-preventing-morbidity-preterm-infants (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Drayton, E., Dreyer, G., Giri, K., Raban, M.Z., Tshomo, D., Wangdi, C., et al. (2019) ‘Assessment of a neuro-developmental screening tool in children in Bhutan’, Gates Open Research, 3, 1496. Available at: https://gatesopenresearch.org/articles/3-1496 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Hamadani, J.D., Mehrin, S.F., Tofail, F., Hasan, M.I., Huda, S.N., Baker-Henningham, H., et al. (2016) ‘Validation and adaptation of Rapid Neurodevelopmental Assessment Instrument for Infants in Guatemala’, Child: Care, Health and Development, 42(1), pp. 87-96. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4715612/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Spittle, A., Orton, J., Anderson, P.J., Boyd, R. and Doyle, L.W. (2015) ‘Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(11), CD005495. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379371024_Cochrane_Library_Cochrane_Database_of_Systematic_Reviews_Early_developmental_intervention_programmes_provided_post_hospital_discharge_to_prevent_motor_and_cognitive_impairment_in_preterm_infants_Revie (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Albers, C.A. and Grieve, A.J. (2024) ‘Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development’, StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK567715/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Bayley, N. (2006) Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development–Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment. Available at: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Bayley_Scales_of_Infant_and_Toddler_Development (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Soofi, S.B., Khan, G.N., Ariff, S., Ihtesham, Y., Turab, A., Ahmed, I., et al. (2023) ‘The predictive validity of Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III at 2 years for later general abilities: Findings from a rural, disadvantaged cohort in Pakistan’, PLOS Global Public Health, 3(4), e0001485. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001485 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Reuner, G., Weinschenk, A. and Pauen, S. (2024) ‘Are the Results of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) Predictive for Later Motor Skills and School Performance?’, Children, 11(12), 1486. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/11/12/1486 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Solodunova, M., Myatchin, I., Laczó, B., Soovik, K.L. and Ygge, J. (2022) ‘A psychometric study of the Russian-language version of the “Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development–third edition”: An assessment of reliability and validity’, Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 961567. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961567/full (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Wechsler, D. (2014) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition (WISC-V). San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Available at: https://www.child-psychologist.com.au/wechsler-intelligence-scale-for-children.html (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Wechsler, D. (2014) ‘Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children’, Wikipedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wechsler_Intelligence_Scale_for_Children (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Pearson Clinical (2016) WISC-V UK: Fast Facts. London: Pearson. Available at: https://www.pearsonclinical.co.uk/content/dam/school/global/clinical/uk-clinical/files/fastcheet3wiscvuk.pdf (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
de Jong, M.J., van der Sluis, S. and de Jong, P.F. (2023) ‘The validity of WISC-V profiles of strengths and weaknesses’, Journal of Intelligence, 11(5), 94. Available at: https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/144934475/de-jong-2023-the-validity-of-wisc-v-profiles-of-strengths-and-weaknesses.pdf (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Wechsler, D. (2014) WISC-V - Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children | Fifth Edition. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments. Available at: https://www.pearsonassessments.com/en-us/Store/Professional-Assessments/Cognition-%26-Neuro/Wechsler-Intelligence-Scale-for-Children-%7C-Fifth-Edition-/p/100000771 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Schulz, J., Henderson, S.E., Sugden, D.A. and Barnett, A.L. (2021) ‘The MABC-2 Checklist: A Review of the Psychometric Properties of A Screening Tool for Developmental Coordination Disorder’, Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 9(2), pp. 302-328. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352511009_The_MABC-2_Checklist_A_Review_of_the_Psychometric_Properties_of_A_Screening_Tool_for_Developmental_Coordination_Disorder (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Henderson, S.E., Sugden, D.A. and Barnett, A.L. (2007) *Movement Assessment Battery for Children–Second Edition (MABC-2)*. London: Harcourt Assessment. Available at: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Movement_Assessment_Battery_for_Children (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Smits-Engelsman, B.C.M., Schoemaker, M.M., Delabastita, T., Hoskens, J. and Geuze, R.H. (2024) ‘Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Movement Assessment Battery Second Edition (M-ABC2): A Cross-Sectional Study’, Children, 11(5), 589. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11120573/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Henderson, S.E., Sugden, D.A. and Barnett, A.L. (2007) Movement Assessment Battery for Children–Second Edition. Chicago, IL: Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Available at: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/movement-assessment-battery-children-second-edition-0 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Psotta, R. and Abdollahipour, R. (2018) ‘Psychometric properties of the qualitative assessment of manual dexterity in the MABC-2 test’, Acta Gymnica, 48(2), pp. 65-73. Available at: https://www.gymnica.upol.cz/artkey/gym-201802-0003_psychometric_properties_of_the_qualitative_assessment_of_manual_dexterity_in_the_mabc-2_test.php (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Achenbach, T.M. (2009) The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA): Development, Findings, Theory, and Applications. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achenbach_System_of_Empirically_Based_Assessment (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Ivanova, M.Y., Achenbach, T.M., Rescorla, L.A., Harder, V.S., Ang, R.P., Bilenberg, N., et al. (2010) ‘Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Child Behavior Checklist’, Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18(4), pp. 209-219. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/k7yqz_v1 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
University of Bristol (2019) Risk of bias tools. Bristol: University of Bristol. Available at: https://www.riskofbias.info/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Sterne, J.A.C., Higgins, J.P.T. and the RoB 2 development group (2019) RoB 2 tool. Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/riskofbiastool/welcome/rob-2-0-tool (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
de Souza, M.C., de Jesus, F.L.A., Machado, D.L., de Souza, T.V. and de Oliveira, V.C. (2018) ‘Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review’, BMJ Open, 8(10), e021734. Available at: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/10/e021734 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Verissimo, A.V.R., de Castro, M.V., de Oliveira, A.C.P.L., da Silva, A.C. and da Silva, R.A. (2023) ‘Twenty years of emotional-behavioral problems of children and adolescents assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist: a systematic review’, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1161917. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1161917/full (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Achenbach, T.M. and Rescorla, L.A. (2007) ‘The Achenbach system of empirically based assessment’, in Handbook of Psychoeducational Assessment. Academic Press, pp. 343-362. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285354629_The_Achenbach_system_of_empirically_based_assessment (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Döpfner, M., Adam, J., Habbel, C., Schulte-Markwort, M., Fegert, J.M., Plück, J., et al. (2024) ‘Supplementary scales for the school-age forms of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment rated by adolescents, parents, and teachers: Psychometric properties in German samples’, PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0303329. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12050941/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Sparrow, S.S., Cicchetti, D.V. and Saulnier, C.A. (2016) *Endpoint Reliability Solutions for Vineland-3 Scale*. Philadelphia, PA: Signant Health. Available at: https://signanthealth.com/resources/blog/electronic-vineland-3-scale-ecoa (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Sparrow, S.S., Cicchetti, D.V. and Saulnier, C.A. (2016) *Vineland-3 - Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales | Third Edition*. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments. Available at: https://www.pearsonassessments.com/en-us/Store/Professional-Assessments/Behavior/Vineland-Adaptive-Behavior-Scales-%7C-Third-Edition/p/100001622 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Bruininks, R.H. and Bruininks, B.D. (2005) *Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2)*. Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing. Available at: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/bruininks-oseretsky-test-motor-proficiency-second-edition (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Vameghi, R., Shams, A., Shamsipour Dehkordi, P. and Sohrabi, M. (2019) ‘Test of Motor Proficiency Second Edition (BOT-2): Compatibility of the Complete and Short Form and Its Usefulness for Middle-Age School Children’, Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, 29(2), e80188. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6489893/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Deitz, J.C., Kartin, D. and Kopp, K. (2007) ‘Review of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2)’, Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 27(4), pp. 87-102. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5815659_Review_of_the_Bruininks-Oseretsky_Test_of_Motor_Proficiency_Second_Edition_BOT-2 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Asadi, A., Saez, M., Aparicio, A. and Morte, R. (2023) ‘The Validity and Reliability of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency–Second Edition in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder’, Journal of Motor Behavior, 55(6), pp. 629-638. Available at: https://aassjournal.com/article-1-581-en.html (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Bruininks, R.H. and Bruininks, B.D. (2005) *BOT-2 - Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency | Second Edition*. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments. Available at: https://www.pearsonassessments.com/en-us/Store/Professional-Assessments/Motor-Sensory/Bruininks-Oseretsky-Test-of-Motor-Proficiency-%7C-Second-Edition/p/100000648 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Deitz, J.C., Kartin, D. and Kopp, K. (2007) ‘Review of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2)’, Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 27(4), pp. 87-102. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18032151/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Green, E., Stroud, L., Bloomfield, S., Cronje, J., Foxcroft, C., Hurter, K., et al. (2020) Griffiths Mental Development Scales–Extended Revised (GMDS-ER). London: Education Endowment Foundation. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/measures-database/griffiths-mental-development-scales-extended-revised (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Green, E., Stroud, L., O'Connell, R. and Bloomfield, S. (2015) ‘The Griffiths Scales of Mental Development: A Factorial Validity Study’, Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(6), pp. 1106-1113. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258185044_The_Griffiths_Scales_of_Mental_Development_A_Factorial_Validity_Study (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Campos, D., Ribeiro, C., Caetano, L., Guedes, S., Magalhães, L. and Martinez, C. (2025) ‘Griffiths Scales of Child Development 3rd Edition: normalization for the Brazilian population’, Frontiers in Pediatrics, 13, 1481442. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1481442/full (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Campos, D., Ribeiro, C., Caetano, L., Guedes, S., Magalhães, L. and Martinez, C. (2025) ‘Griffiths Scales of Child Development 3rd Edition: normalization for the Brazilian population’, Frontiers in Pediatrics, 13, 1481442. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1481442/pdf (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Green, E. (2016) ‘Griffiths Scales of Child Development 3rd Edition; Part 1: Overview Development and Psychometric Properties.’, Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 28(2), pp. 155-172. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305082718_Griffiths_Scales_of_Child_Development_3rd_Edition_Part_1_Overview_Development_and_Psychometric_Properties (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Eaves, L.C., Nuttall, J.C. and Murray, M.G. (1980) ‘Griffiths Scales of Mental Development and different users’, Child: Care, Health and Development, 6(1), pp. 11-16. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7363405/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Korkman, M., Kirk, U. and Kemp, S. (2007) *NEPSY-II Chapter 2 - Design and Purpose*. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Clinical. Available at: https://www.pearsonclinical.ca/content/dam/school/global/clinical/us/assets/nepsy-ii/nepsy-ii-design-and-purpose.pdf (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Korkman, M., Kirk, U. and Kemp, S. (2007) NEPSY-II: A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233025061_NEPSY-II_A_Developmental_Neuropsychological_Assessment_Second_Edition (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Fay-Stammbach, T., Hawes, D.J. and Meredith, P. (2017) ‘Psychometric properties of the NEPSY-II affect recognition subtest in a preschool sample: a Rasch modeling approach’, Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(5), pp. 913-928. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28649901/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Korkman, M. (1988) ‘NEPSY – A proposed neuropsychological test battery for young developmentally disabled children’, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10(1), p. 110. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEPSY (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Korkman, M., Kirk, U. and Kemp, S. (2007) NEPSY-II - Second Edition. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments. Available at: https://www.pearsonassessments.com/en-us/Store/Professional-Assessments/Academic-Learning/NEPSY-%7C-Second-Edition/p/100000584 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Korkman, M., Kirk, U. and Kemp, S. (2007) Second Edition (NEPSY-II): Social Perception battery. Sydney: UNSW. Available at: https://www2.psy.unsw.edu.au/Users/Smcdonald/Resources/Omnibus%20tests/NEPSY%20Social%20Cognition%20Battery.pdf (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Lay, A.M., Chen, Y., Lund, T.C., Oron, A.P., Hord, J.D., Thompson, A.A., et al. (2021) ‘Psychometric Study of the Social Responsiveness Scale in Phelan-McDermid Syndrome’, Autism Research, 14(7), pp. 1445-1456. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8103889/ (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Constantino, J.N. and Gruber, C.P. (2012) *Social Responsiveness Scale–Second Edition (SRS-2)*. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270689778_Test_review_Social_Responsiveness_Scale-Second_Edition_SRS-2 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Constantino, J.N. and Gruber, C.P. (2012) *SRS-2 - Social Responsiveness Scale ™ , Second Edition*. Lutz, FL: PAR, Inc. Available at: https://www.parinc.com/products/SRS-2 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Constantino, J.N. and Gruber, C.P. (2012) *SRS-2 - Social Responsiveness Scale, 2nd Edition*. Sydney: Pearson Clinical Assessment AU&NZ. Available at: https://www.pearsonclinical.com.au/en-au/Store/Professional-Assessments/Behaviour/Social-Responsiveness-Scale%2C-2nd-Edition/p/P100010194 (Accessed: 1 September 2025).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurul Purnamasari, Ririn Azhari (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing here keep copyright but grant the journal first publication rights, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License. They can distribute their work non-exclusively elsewhere with an acknowledgment of its first publication in this journal. Posting the work online before and during submission for earlier and greater citation is encouraged, reflecting Open Access benefits.
