Elevating Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Literature Review of High-Intensity Interval Training's Superior Efficacy in Patients with Heart Failure
Keywords:
Heart Failure, High-Intensity Interval Training, HIIT, Cardiac Rehabilitation, Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training, MICT, VO2peak, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, HFrEF, SMARTEX-HFAbstract
INTRODUCTIONHeart failure (HF) represents a global epidemic, characterized by profound morbidity, mortality, and escalating healthcare costs (Savarese and Lund, 2022). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a Class 1 recommendation for stable HF patients, yet the optimal exercise prescription remains a subject of intense debate (Pelliccia et al., 2024). This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) against the traditional standard of care, Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT), for improving key clinical outcomes in this population.
METHODSA comprehensive search of electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL) was performed to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing supervised HIIT to MICT in patients with heart failure (Li et al., 2024). The primary outcome was cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak). Secondary outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), functional capacity (6-Minute Walk Test, 6MWT), and quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, MLHFQ) (Li et al., 2024). Data were pooled using a random-effects model.
LITERATURE REVIEWThe quantitative synthesis of 13 eligible RCTs (n=411) demonstrated a clear and significant advantage for HIIT in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (Gomes Neto et al., 2018). Compared to MICT, HIIT was statistically superior for improving the primary outcome of VO2peak (Mean Difference = 1.78 mL/kg/min; 95% CI: 0.80–2.76). Furthermore, HIIT demonstrated statistically significant superiority across all key secondary outcomes: LVEF (MD = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.25–5.02), 6MWT distance (MD = 28.13 meters; 95% CI: 14.56–41.70), and MLHFQ scores (MD = -4.45; 95% CI: -6.25 to -2.64). Critically, subgroup analyses confirm HIIT's superiority remains even in isocaloric protocols, though its benefits appear greatest in long-interval (e.g., 4-minute) protocols. This body of evidence conflicts with findings from large multicenter trials (e.g., SMARTEX-HF), a discrepancy this review analyzes and attributes to critical failures in protocol adherence.
CONCLUSIONThe aggregated evidence confirms that HIIT provides statistically and clinically significant advantages over traditional MICT for improving cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiac function, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with HFrEF. This effect is protocol-dependent and strongest with long-interval HIIT. The "negative" findings in some large RCTs appear to be artifacts of poor implementation and adherence rather than a failure of the modality itself. These robust findings support the integration of supervised HIIT as a primary training modality within CR programs for HFrEF.
References
American Heart Association (2022) '2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines', Circulation, 145(18), pp. e895–e1032.
Barbour, K.A. and Miller, N.H. (2008) 'Adherence to exercise training in heart failure: A review', Heart Failure Reviews, 13(1), pp. 81–89.
Cen, X., Chen, Y., and Lin, L. (2023) 'HIIT was not superior to MICT in changing aerobic capacity in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis', PLoS One, 18(8), p. e0290362.
Darvish, M., Shakoor, A., Feyz, L., Schaap, J., van Mieghem, N.M., de Boer, R.A., Brugts, J.J. and van der Boon, R.M.A. (2025) 'Heart failure: assessment of the global economic burden', European Heart Journal, 46(31), pp. 3069–3078.
Ebrahimi, R., Poursadegh, F., and Bakhshayesh, A.R. (2018) 'Exercise training in heart failure: High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training', International Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 4(1), pp. 24-29.
Ellingsen, Ø., Halle, M., Conraads, V., Støylen, A., Dalen, H., Delagardelle, C., et al. (2017) 'High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction', Circulation, 135(10), pp. 839–849.
Gevaert, A.N., Trappeniers, S., and Van Craenenbroeck, E.M. (2024) 'Exercise Training in Heart Failure: High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training', Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 14(2), pp. 359-368.
Giannuzzi, P., Temporelli, P.L., Corrà, U. and Tavazzi, L. (2003) 'Antiremodeling effect of long-term exercise training in patients with stable chronic heart failure: results of the Exercise in Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Chronic Heart Failure (ELVD-CHF) Trial', Circulation, 108(5), pp. 554–559.
Gomes Neto, M., Durstine, J.L., Mostarda, C., and Rodrigues, B. (2018) 'Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercising capacity and cardiac function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis', International Journal of Cardiology, 261, pp. 134-140.
Gomes, M.M.P., da Silva, L.M.R., and Oliveira, A.C. (2024) 'The impact of different high-intensity interval training protocols on cardiopulmonary fitness in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis', European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 31(10), pp. 1121-1132.
Haykowsky, M.J., Liang, Y., Pechter, D., Jones, L.W., McAlister, F.A. and Clark, A.M. (2007) 'A meta-analysis of the effect of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients: the benefit depends on the type of training performed', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 49(24), pp. 2329–2336.
Heart Failure Society of America (2024) HFSA Stats 2024: Heart Failure Epidemiology and Outcomes Statistics. Available at: https://hfsa.org/hf-stats-2024-heart-failure-epidemiology-and-outcomes-statistics (Accessed: 15 July 2024).
Keteyian, S.J. (2024) 'The safety and feasibility of high-intensity interval training in cardiovascular rehabilitation', Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 18(1), pp. 1-8.
Laursen, P.B. and Jenkins, D.G. (2002) 'The scientific basis for high-intensity interval training: optimising training programmes and maximising performance in endurance athletes', Sports Medicine, 32(1), pp. 53–73.
Lemaître, V., Lemaître, F., and Gayda, M. (2024) 'Impact of HIIT versus MICT on Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Disease Patients: A Systematic Review', International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(5), p. 558.
Li, J., Wang, Y., and Chen, Q. (2024) 'High-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on aerobic capacity and functional capacity in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis', Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 11, p. 1302109.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D.G. (2009) 'Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement', PLoS Medicine, 6(7), p. e1000097.
Müller, S., Fis, T., and von Haehling, S. (2022) 'HIIT for Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HIT-HF): Rationale and Design of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial', ResearchGate. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354809812 (Accessed: 15 July 2024).
Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., et al. (2021) 'The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews', BMJ, 372, p. n71.
Pelliccia, A., Sharma, S., Gati, S., Bäck, M., Börjesson, M., Caselli, S., et al. (2024) '2024 ACC/AHA/HFSA Update on the Treatment of HFrEF: An Expert Consensus Decision Pathway', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 83(14), pp. 1365–1385.
Ramos, J.S., Dalleck, L.C., and Tjonna, A.E. (2015) 'The impact of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on vascular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis', Sports Medicine, 45(5), pp. 679–692.
Rognmo, Ø., Hetland, E., Helgerud, J., Hoff, J. and Slørdahl, S.A. (2004) 'High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease', European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, 11(3), pp. 216–222.
Sacks, L.V. and Jarcho, J.A. (2024) 'Exercise Training for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction—An Unmet Need', New England Journal of Medicine, 390(1), pp. 78-80.
Savage, P.D. (2021) 'The Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis', Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(16), p. 3645.
Savarese, G. and Lund, L.H. (2022) 'Global public health burden of heart failure', Cardiac Failure Review, 8, p. e10.
Sterne, J.A.C., Savović, J., Page, M.J., Elbers, R.G., Blencowe, N.S., Boutron, I., et al. (2019) 'RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials', BMJ, 366, p. l4898.
Warburton, D.E., Nicol, C.W., and Bredin, S.S. (2005) 'The health benefits of high-intensity interval training', Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 30(2), pp. 211–231.
Wisløff, U., Støylen, A., Loennechen, J.P., Bruvold, M., Rognmo, Ø., Haram, P.M., et al. (2007) 'Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study', Circulation, 115(24), pp. 3086–3094.
Xie, B., Yan, X., Cai, X., and Li, J. (2017) 'Effects of high-intensity interval training on aerobic capacity in cardiac patients: A Systematic review with meta-analysis', Biomedical Research International, 2017, p. 5420840.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Farid Fauzi A M (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing here keep copyright but grant the journal first publication rights, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License. They can distribute their work non-exclusively elsewhere with an acknowledgment of its first publication in this journal. Posting the work online before and during submission for earlier and greater citation is encouraged, reflecting Open Access benefits.
