The Efficacy of Multifaceted Breastfeeding Promotion Programs on Maternal and Infant Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Keywords:
Breastfeeding Promotion, Exclusive Breastfeeding, Peer Support, mHealth, Health Education, Lactation Support, Systematic ReviewAbstract
Introduction: Despite the well-documented health benefits of breastfeeding for mothers and infants, global rates of exclusive and continued breastfeeding fall significantly short of World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. This systematic review synthesizes and evaluates the evidence on the efficacy of various breastfeeding promotion programs designed to address this critical public health gap.
Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs was conducted. Major electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Springer, Wiley Online Library, were searched for studies evaluating any structured intervention aimed at improving breastfeeding outcomes compared to usual care. The methodological quality of included studies was rigorously assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A narrative synthesis of the findings was performed, structured by intervention type, with quantitative data pooled for meta-analysis where appropriate.
Results: The evidence from 17 high-quality trials and meta-analyses demonstrates that structured breastfeeding promotion programs yield significant positive effects. Multi-component interventions that combine education with proactive, ongoing support consistently improve rates of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at key postpartum intervals, including 4-6 weeks and up to 6 months. Specifically, system-level policies like the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) significantly increase EBF at 3 months (43.3% vs 6.4%) and reduce infant gastrointestinal infections (Odds Ratio 0.60). Peer and lay support models are highly effective, increasing breastfeeding duration and exclusivity while reducing infant morbidity. Furthermore, technology-mediated interventions (e.g., mHealth, web-based support) represent a powerful and scalable approach, significantly increasing EBF rates at 6 months (Risk Ratio 1.87) and nearly doubling the median duration of EBF in some trials. Interventions targeting fathers also show substantial benefits, increasing full breastfeeding rates at 6 months (25% vs 15%).
Discussion: The synthesized evidence strongly supports a paradigm shift from passive, single-component educational approaches to proactive, multi-faceted, and sustained support systems. The most effective interventions enhance maternal self-efficacy, provide timely and accessible information, and create a supportive ecosystem involving healthcare professionals, peers, and family. Scalable models, including peer counseling and technology-based platforms, offer promising solutions for widespread implementation.
Conclusion: Breastfeeding promotion programs are a demonstrably effective public health strategy for improving breastfeeding rates and associated maternal and infant health outcomes. To maximize impact, programs should be structured, continuous, and leverage a synergistic combination of professional, peer, and technological support tailored to the needs of the target population.
References
ie. (n.d.). Effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on breastfeeding rates, with special focus on developing countries. Development Evidence Portal.
Adane, A., Fentie, A., Gesese, T., & Assefa, N. (2023). The effects of mHealth interventions on improving institutional delivery, postnatal care utilization, and exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 12(1), 1-13.
Alberta Health Services. (n.d.). A Quantitative Review of the Evidence for Breastfeeding Support.
Asare, B. Y., et al. (2025). Effect of Group Antenatal Care on Breastfeeding Knowledge and Practices Among Pregnant Women in Ghana: Findings from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(12), 1587.
Assefa, N., et al. (2025). Effectiveness of immediate postpartum breastfeeding counseling on early initiation and exclusive breastfeeding practices among postpartum mothers in Bule Hora and Yabelo hospitals, southern Ethiopia: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Nutrition, 12, 1473086.
Balogun, O. O., O'Sullivan, E. J., McFadden, A., Ota, E., Gavine, A., Garner, C. D.,... & Renfrew, M. J. (2016). Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (11).
Berger, V. W. (2003). The p-value to control for selection bias. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 2(1), 8.
Bhutta, Z. A., Das, J. K., Rizvi, A., Gaffey, M. F., Walker, N., Horton, S.,... & Lancet Nutrition Interventions Review Group. (2013). Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost?. The Lancet, 382(9890), 452-477.
Biggs, S., et al. (2024). Can breastfeeding support interventions target depression to prevent the development of depression after birth?. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Bonuck, K., Stuebe, A., Barnett, J., Labbok, M. H., Fletcher, J., & Bernstein, J. (2013). Effect of primary care-based lactation counseling on breastfeeding duration and intensity. American Journal of Public Health, 104(S1), S119-S127.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2011). Breastfeeding peer counseling: from efficacy through scale-up. University of York.
Chapman, D. J., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2010). Breastfeeding peer counseling: from efficacy through scale-up. Journal of Human Lactation, 26(3), 314-326.
Chapman, D. J., Damio, G., Young, S., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2005). A randomized trial assessing the efficacy of peer counseling on exclusive breastfeeding in a predominantly Latina low-income community. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159(9), 836-841.
Chung, M., Raman, G., Trikalinos, T., Lau, J., & Ip, S. (2008). Interventions in primary care to promote breastfeeding: an evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149(8), 565-582.
ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). A Community Health Nurse/Peer Counselor Team to Promote Breastfeeding Among Low-Income Women. (NCT00608088).
ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). The Development and Evaluation of a Web-based Childbirth and Parenting Intervention Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (NCT04981730).
ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Web-based Educational Intervention on Breastfeeding Self-efficacy. (NCT04798872).
de Oliveira, M. I. C., de Lira, P. I. C., de Carvalho, M. F. C. C., & de Oliveira, A. C. M. (2019). Online participatory intervention to promote and support exclusive breastfeeding: Randomized clinical trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e12389.
de Oliveira, K. L., et al. (2020). Effect of a breastfeeding educational intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 28, e3335.
Dennis, C. L., Hodnett, E., Gallop, R., & Chalmers, B. (2002). The effect of peer support on breastfeeding duration among primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ, 166(1), 21-28.
Dyson, L., McCormick, F. M., & Renfrew, M. J. (2008). Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4).
Dyson, L., et al. (2019). Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Fairbank, L., O'Meara, S., Renfrew, M. J., Woolridge, M., Sowden, A. J., & Lister-Sharp, D. (2000). A systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to promote the initiation of breastfeeding. Health Technology Assessment, 4(25), 1-171.
Forster, D. A., McLardie-Hore, F. E., McLachlan, H. L., Davey, M. A., Grimes, H. A., Dennis, C. L.,... & Amir, L. H. (2018). Ringing Up About Breastfeeding earlY (RUBY) — Proactive telephone peer support for breastfeeding: a randomised controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine, 2-3, 34-42.
Fregni, F., & Boggio, P. S. (2014). Principles of clinical research. Principles and practice of clinical research, 11-25.
GiveWell. (2022). Breastfeeding Promotion.
González-Díaz, R. A., et al. (2024). Effectiveness of a Midwife-Led Group Intervention for Breastfeeding Support: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(5), 1334.
Guise, J. M., Palda, V., Westhoff, C., Chan, B. K., Helfand, M., & Lieu, T. A. (2003). The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to promote breastfeeding: systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Family Medicine, 1(2), 70-78.
Habte, M., et al. (2025). Effectiveness of Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative on Early Initiation and Exclusive Breastfeeding Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ResearchGate.
Hans, S. L., et al. (2018). A randomized controlled trial of a home-visiting intervention with community doulas: The impact on maternal and child health outcomes in the first 3 months postpartum. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22(1), 105-114.
Kaunelis, D., et al. (2010). A systematic review of the effectiveness of universal and targeted breastfeeding peer support interventions. CMAJ, 182(16), 1739-1746.
Kowalska, M., et al. (2023). Telemedicine and Breastfeeding: The Time Has Come. ResearchGate.
Kramer, M. S., Chalmers, B., Hodnett, E. D., Sevkovskaya, Z., Dzikovich, I., Shapiro, S.,... & Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) Study Group. (2001). Promotion of breastfeeding intervention trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. JAMA, 285(4), 413-420.
Kramer, M. S., et al. (2000). Promotion of breastfeeding intervention trial (PROBIT): a cluster-randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. Design, follow-up, and data validation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 478, 327-45.
Lau, Y., Htun, T. P., Lim, P. I., Klainin-Yobas, P., & Chi, C. (2021). The effectiveness of virtual lactation support on exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Human Lactation, 37(4), 707-725.
Lau, Y., et al. (2020). Internet-Based E-Technologies for Promoting Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 3(2), e18899.
Lau, Y., et al. (2022). Feasibility and Acceptability of an Online Messaging Peer Support Group for Breastfeeding: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study Protocol. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(3), e32338.
Lee, M. K., & Lee, S. H. (2021). Mothers’ experiences of online breastfeeding peer support: An integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(6), 2633-2645.
Li, Q., et al. (2024). The role of paternal support in breastfeeding outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24(1), 1-11.
Martin, R. M., et al. (2013). Effects of an intervention to promote breastfeeding on maternal adiposity and blood pressure at 11.5 y postpartum: results from the Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial, a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 98(4), 1048-1056.
MCH Library. (n.d.). Established Results for Breastfeeding: Lactation Consultants.
MCH Library. (n.d.). Established Results for Breastfeeding: Peer Counselors.
McFadden, A., Gavine, A., Renfrew, M. J., Wade, A., Buchanan, P., Taylor, J. L.,... & MacGillivray, S. (2017). Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2).
McLardie-Hore, F. E., et al. (2017). Supporting breastfeeding In Local Communities (SILC): a description of a home-based breastfeeding support intervention. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 13(4), e12389.
McLardie-Hore, F. E., et al. (2020). Proactive telephone-based peer support for breastfeeding: a cross-sectional survey of women's experiences of receiving support in the RUBY randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 10(8), e036725.
McLardie-Hore, F. E., et al. (2023). Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the 'Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY' (RUBY) randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 13(6), e069542.
Nguyen, P. H., et al. (2019). Effect of a community‐based intervention for fathers on early breastfeeding practices in Viet Nam: a quasi‐experimental study. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 15(1), e12662.
NICE. (2023). Breastfeeding: maintaining breastfeeding beyond 8 weeks. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Nordin, N. M., et al. (2022). The Effect of a Face-to-Face and WhatsApp-Based Health Education Intervention on Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy, Knowledge, and Attitude in Malaysia: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 10(9), e31996.
Pate, M. L. (2009). A systematic review of the effectiveness of breastfeeding intervention delivery methods. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 38(6), 646-655.
Patnode, C. D., et al. (2016). Primary Care Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA, 316(16), 1694-1705.
Patnode, C. D., et al. (2023). Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: An Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Pisacane, A., Continisio, G. I., Aldinucci, M., D'Amora, S., & Continisio, P. (2005). A controlled trial of the father's role in breastfeeding promotion. Pediatrics, 116(4), e494-e498.
Renfrew, M. J., et al. (2017). Cochrane Review Summary: Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 18(5), 416-418.
Rethinking Clinical Trials. (n.d.). Concealment and Masking.
Siddiqui, A., et al. (2023). Effectiveness of interventions to promote optimal breastfeeding practices in low-and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 984876.
Skouteris, H., et al. (2018). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions incorporating behaviour change techniques to promote breastfeeding among postpartum women. University College London.
Soriano-Vidal, F. J., et al. (2018). Telephone support for breastfeeding. A randomised clinical trial. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition), 89(3), 160-167.
Taki, S., et al. (2023). Perinatal support for breastfeeding using mHealth: A mixed methods feasibility study of the My Baby Now app. Women and Birth, 36(2), 193-201.
Tarrant, M., Wu, K. M., Tam, W. S., Nelson, E. A., Ayres, J. G., & Dodgson, J. E. (2015). Antenatal education to increase exclusive breastfeeding: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 125(6), 1431-1438.
Torki, Z., et al. (2012). The effect of peer support, education by health care providers, and routine care on the duration of exclusive breastfeeding. BMRAT, 1(2), 52-59.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2016). Breastfeeding: Interventions. JAMA, 316(16), 1685-1687.
UNICEF UK. (n.d.). Research on supporting breastfeeding.
Wang, Y., et al. (2023). Effect of online intervention mode on breastfeeding results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23(1), 1-13.
WHO. (2018). Guideline: counselling of women to improve breastfeeding practices. World Health Organization.
Withpower.com. (n.d.). A Study to Improve Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates Among Latine Mothers.
Wong, K. L., Tarrant, M., & Lok, K. Y. W. (2015). Group versus individual professional antenatal breastfeeding education for extending breastfeeding duration and exclusivity: a systematic review. Journal of Human Lactation, 31(3), 366-379.
Wong, M. S., et al. (2024). Characteristics of Prenatal Breastfeeding Education Interventions That Improve Breastfeeding Duration: A Scoping Review. Journal of Human Lactation, 40(1), 68-81.
Wood, N. K., et al. (2024). Association of Lactation Consultant Interventions With Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics.
Yeşil, Y., & Çalık, K. Y. (2023). Effect of antenatal educational intervention on maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy and breastfeeding success: A quasi-experimental study. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 57, e20220377.
Yesil, Y., et al. (2023). The effect of breastfeeding education given to family members on maternal breastfeeding outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Research, 10(1), 45-53.
Zhang, Y., et al. (2025). Effectiveness of a Mobile Health Intervention on Exclusive Breastfeeding and Maternal Well-being: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 13(1), e67024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ade Rahma Anggraini, Fauzan Azim (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing here keep copyright but grant the journal first publication rights, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License. They can distribute their work non-exclusively elsewhere with an acknowledgment of its first publication in this journal. Posting the work online before and during submission for earlier and greater citation is encouraged, reflecting Open Access benefits.
