Agreement Between Knee Radiography and Knee Ultrasonography in the Detection of Osteophyte (Spur) Formation and Joint Space Narrowing in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study at Gatot Soebroto Central Army Hospital, Indonesia, August-September 2026
Keywords:
knee osteoarthritis, radiography, ultrasonography, osteophyte, joint space narrowing, Cohen’s kappaAbstract
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common degenerative joint diseases among adult and older populations, with osteophyte (spur) formation and joint space narrowing (JSN) as its two principal radiological hallmarks. Conventional radiography remains the standard imaging modality but is limited by its two-dimensional nature and inability to directly assess soft tissue, whereas ultrasonography (US) allows real-time visualization of bone margins and periarticular soft tissue without ionizing radiation. Reported agreement (kappa) between radiography and US for osteophyte detection varies widely across populations (0.18–0.58), underscoring the need for population-specific data.
Objective: To determine the level of agreement between knee radiography and knee US in detecting osteophyte formation and joint space narrowing in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Methods: An analytic observational study with a cross-sectional design was conducted on 42 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of knee OA who underwent weight-bearing knee radiography and knee US of the same knee at the Radiology Installation of Gatot Soebroto Central Army Hospital (RSPAD Gatot Soebroto Puskesad), Jakarta, Indonesia, between August and September 2026. Subjects were enrolled by consecutive sampling. Radiographic (anteroposterior weight-bearing and lateral) and B-mode US (high-frequency linear transducer, weight-bearing position) examinations were interpreted independently by different radiologists. Agreement was analyzed using Cohen’s kappa (κ), with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of radiography relative to US calculated as supplementary diagnostic parameters.
Results: Of 42 subjects, the majority were female (35; 83.3%), with a mean age of 59.79 years (median 58; range 40–82 years). Osteophyte formation was detected in 38 subjects (90.5%) by radiography and 36 subjects (85.7%) by US, yielding κ = 0.774 (95% CI 0.469–1.000; p < 0.001; substantial agreement). All discordant pairs (n = 2) showed the pattern “radiography positive, US negative,” giving radiography a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 66.7%, PPV of 94.7%, and NPV of 100% relative to US. Joint space narrowing was identically detected in 40 of 42 subjects (95.2%) by both modalities, yielding κ = 1.000 (95% CI 1.000–1.000; p < 0.001; almost perfect agreement). US additionally identified patellar cartilage thinning in 38 (90.5%), meniscal degeneration in 36 (85.7%), synovitis in 35 (83.3%), and knee joint effusion in 3 of 42 subjects (7.1%) — findings not assessable by radiography.
Conclusion: Knee radiography and knee US show substantial-to-almost-perfect agreement in detecting osteophyte formation and joint space narrowing, supporting the use of knee US as a complementary, radiation-free modality in the evaluation of knee osteoarthritis, particularly given its additional capacity to characterize periarticular soft-tissue abnormalities not detectable by radiography.
References
Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1745–1759.
Steinmetz JD, Culbreth GT, Haile LM, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990–2020 and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5:e508–e522.
Cui A, Li H, Wang D, Zhong J, Chen Y, Lu H. Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;29–30:100587.
Hawker GA. The burden of osteoarthritis in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2022;38(2):181–192.
Conaghan PG, Hunter DJ, Maillefert JF, Reichmann WM, Losina E. Imaging in osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2013;39(3):567–589.
Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Hayashi D, et al. Imaging of osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2013;39:67–105.
Katz JN, Arant KR, Loeser RF. Diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a review. JAMA. 2021;325(6):568–578.
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494–502.
Resnick D. Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2016.
Perico DA, Uribe AC, Niño SJ, Mayorga MCP, Sundfeld C, Lievano JR, et al. A proposed modification to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification for knee osteoarthritis using a compartment-specific approach. J Exp Orthop. 2024;11:e12008.
Wing N, Van Zyl N, Wing M, Corrigan R, Loch A, Wall C. Reliability of three radiographic classification systems for knee osteoarthritis among observers of different experience levels. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50(2):399–405.
Olsson S, Akbarian E, Lind A, Sharif Razavian A, Gordon M. Automating classification of osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence in the knee using deep learning in an unfiltered adult population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:659.
Roemer FW, Demehri S, Omoumi P, Link TM, Kijowski R, Saarakkala S, et al. State of the art: imaging of osteoarthritis—revisited 2020. Radiology. 2020;296(1):5–21.
Delle Sedie A, Riente L, Bombardieri S. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(1):1–8.
Yusuf E, Nelissen RG, Ioan-Facsinay A, et al. Imaging modalities in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014;28(1):31–60.
Okano T, Filippucci E, Di Carlo M, Draghessi A, Carotti M, Salaffi F, Wright G, Grassi W. Ultrasonographic evaluation of joint damage in knee osteoarthritis: feature-specific comparisons with conventional radiography. Rheumatology. 2016;55:2040–2049.
Harosa MA, Nicoară AI, Bărbulescu AL, Biță CE, Dinescu ȘC, Filippucci E, Porta F, Vreju FA. The role of ultrasound versus radiography in knee osteoarthritis: a bilateral comparative study. Life. 2026;16(9):1453.
D’Agostino V, Sorriento A, Cafarelli A, Donati D, Papalexis N, Russo A, Lisignoli G, Ricotti L, Spinnato P. Ultrasound imaging in knee osteoarthritis: current role, recent advancements, and future perspectives. J Clin Med. 2024;13:4930.
Suwal S, K.C. B, Katwal S, Chataut D, Lohani B. Comparative evaluation of knee osteoarthritis: radiography vs. ultrasonography in Nepalese population: a cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg. 2024;86:5131–5136.
Nguyen K, Tran D. Ultrasonographic assessment of knee osteoarthritis and its agreement with radiography [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol (ACR Meeting Abstracts). 2021.
American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Knee Pain. Virginia: ACR; 2023.
European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). EULAR recommendations for imaging in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021.
Sharma L. Osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(1):51–59.
Möller I, Janta I, Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Bong DA, Martinoli C, Filippucci E, Sconfienza LM, Terslev L, Damjanov N, et al. The 2017 EULAR standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1974–1979.
Jacobson JA. Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018.
Kahat DH, Nouraee CM, Smith JS, Santiago CC, Floyd ER, Zbyn S, Abbasguliyev H, Kajabi AW, Ellermann JM. The relationship between medial meniscal extrusion and outcome measures for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12:23259671241248457.
Stoddart JC, Dandridge O, Garner A, Cobb J, van Arkel RJ. The compartmental distribution of knee osteoarthritis – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021;29(4):445–455.
Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(8):1886–1893.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bintang Bayu Aryandi, Leksmana Arry Chandra, Terawan Agus Putranto, Yanuarso, Vininta Fazharyasti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing here keep copyright but grant the journal first publication rights, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License. They can distribute their work non-exclusively elsewhere with an acknowledgment of its first publication in this journal. Posting the work online before and during submission for earlier and greater citation is encouraged, reflecting Open Access benefits.
