The Analysis Study of Prevalence, Risk Factor, Management of First Trimester Uterine Rupture: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

The Analysis Study of Prevalence, Risk Factor, Management of First Trimester Uterine Rupture: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Authors

  • Niken Septia Nita Faculty of Medicine, YARSI University, Special Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rizki Wardatul W.S Faculty of Medicine, Jember University, Jember Regency, East Java, Indonesia

Keywords:

Uterine rupture, prevalence, risk factor, management, first trimester

Abstract

Background: Most uterine ruptures occur in pregnant women, though it has been reported in non-pregnant women when the uterus is exposed to trauma, infection, or cancer. The aim: The aim of this study to show about prevalence, risk factor, management of first trimester uterine rupture. Methods: By the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. Result: Eight publications were found to be directly related to our ongoing systematic examination after a rigorous three-level screening approach. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis of the complete text was conducted, and additional scrutiny was given to these articles. Conclusion: Uterine rupture in the first trimester of pregnancy is a rare and life-threatening occurrence that can be safely and conservatively treated. The main driving factor behind a scarred uterus is previous caesarean section. Delay in definitive management causes significant fetal morbidity and mortality. For best outcomes, vaginal birth after a previous cesarean section needs close monitoring in appropriately prepared units with the ability to perform immediate cesarean delivery and provide advanced neonatal support.

References

Togioka BM, Tonismae T. Uterine Rupture [Internet]. StatPearls. 2024. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026917

Memon NA, Yousfani S. Analysis of uterine rupture at university teaching hospital Pakistan. Pakistan J Med Sci [Internet]. 1969 Dec 31;31(4):920–4. Available from: http://pjms.com.pk/index.php/pjms/article/view/7303

Cecchini F, Tassi A, Londero AP, Baccarini G, Driul L, Xodo S. First trimester uterine rupture: A case report and literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):1–13.

Getahun WT, Solomon AA, Kassie FY, Kasaye HK, Denekew HT. Uterine rupture among mothers admitted for obstetrics care and associated factors in referral hospitals of Amhara regional state, institution-based cross-sectional study, Northern Ethiopia, 2013-2017. Uthman O, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):e0208470. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L625292349%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208470

Marwah S, Singh S, Bharti N, Gupta PK. Risk Factors and Outcome Analysis in Rupture of Gravid Uterus: Lessons for Obstetricians. Cureus. 2022;14(2).

Agrawal S, Balara A, Kumar L. Uterine Rupture: A Case Series From a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India. Cureus. 2023;15(March):1–6.

Gebretsadik A, Hagos H, Tefera K. Outcome of uterine rupture and associated factors in Yirgalem general and teaching hospital, southern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–7.

Mutiso SK, Oindi FM, Mundia DM. Uterine rupture in the first trimester: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep [Internet]. 2024;18(1):1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-023-04318-w

Alemu AA, Bitew MS, Gelaw KA, Zeleke LB, Kassa GM. Prevalence and determinants of uterine rupture in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020;10(1):1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74477-z

Dimitrova D, Kästner A, Kästner A, Paping A, Henrich W, Braun T. Risk factors and outcomes associated with type of uterine rupture. Arch Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2022;306(6):1967–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06452-0

Abrar S, Abrar T, Sayyed E, Naqvi SA. Ruptured uterus: Frequency, risk factors and feto-maternal outcome: Current scenario in a low-resource setup. PLoS One [Internet]. 2022;17(4 April):1–13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266062

Wan S, Yang M, Pei J, Zhao X, Zhou C, Wu Y, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and associated factors for uterine rupture: an 8 years population-based retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2022;22(1):1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04415-6

Mengesha MB, Weldegeorges DA, Hailesilassie Y, Werid WM, Weldemariam MG, Welay FT, et al. Determinants of Uterine Rupture and Its Management Outcomes among Mothers Who Gave Birth at Public Hospitals of Tigrai, North Ethiopia: An Unmatched Case Control Study. J Pregnancy. 2020;2020.

Jacques Ngoy K, Olivier M, Xavier K K, Prosper L K. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of uterine rupture in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo. Clin J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;3(2):136–41.

Ahmed DM, Mengistu TS, Endalamaw AG. Incidence and factors associated with outcomes of uterine rupture among women delivered at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia: Cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–12.

Feleke G, Tantu T, Zewdu D, Gedefawu A, Wondosen M, Gunta M. Case-control study on determinants of uterine rupture among mothers who gave birth at Hawassa University comprehensive specialized hospital. PLoS One [Internet]. 2023;18(1 January):1–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279175

Zhan W, Zhu J, Hua X, Ye J, Chen Q, Zhang J. Epidemiology of uterine rupture among pregnant women in China and development of a risk prediction model: Analysis of data from a multicentre, cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11):1–8.

Desta M, Amha H, Bishaw KA, Adane F, Assemie MA, Kibret GD, et al. Prevalence and predictors of uterine rupture among Ethiopian women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(11 November):1–19. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240675

Egbe TO, Halle-Ekane GE, Tchente CN, Nyemb JE, Belley-Priso E. Management of uterine rupture: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(1):1–5.

Chiossi G, Amico RD, Tramontano AL, Sampogna V, Laghi V, Facchinetti F. Prevalence of uterine rupture among women with one prior low transverse cesarean and women with unscarred uterus undergoing labor induction with pge2: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021;16(7 July):1–18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253957

Xie J, Lu X, Liu M. Clinical analysis of complete uterine rupture during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2024;24(1):1–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06394-2

Matsuzaki S, Takiuchi T, Kanagawa T, Matsuzaki S, Lee M, Maeda M, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes after prior mid-trimester uterine rupture: A systematic review with our experience. Med. 2021;57(12):1–11.

Abdulmane MM, Sheikhali OM, Alhowaidi RM, Qazi A, Ghazi K. Diagnosis and Management of Uterine Rupture in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Case Series and Literature Review. Cureus. 2023;15(6):1–6.

Tao J, Mu Y, Chen P, Xie Y, Liang J, Zhu J. Pregnancy complications and risk of uterine rupture among women with singleton pregnancies in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):1–12.

Astatikie G, Limenih MA, Kebede M. Maternal and fetal outcomes of uterine rupture and factors associated with maternal death secondary to uterine rupture. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–9.

Motomura K, Ganchimeg T, Nagata C, Ota E, Vogel JP, Betran AP, et al. Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean section: WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2017;7(February):1–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44093

Downloads

Published

2024-09-13

How to Cite

Nita, Niken Septia, and Rizki Wardatul W.S. 2024. “The Analysis Study of Prevalence, Risk Factor, Management of First Trimester Uterine Rupture: A Comprehensive Systematic Review”. The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research 4 (2): 38-57. https://doi.org/10.70070/j24gac96.